What is the derivative of 4x(16-x^2)^0.5?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Tiiba
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivative
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the derivative of the function 4x(16-x^2)^0.5, which is part of a problem concerning the dimensions of the largest rectangle inscribable in a circle with radius 4. Participants explore the differentiation process, the application of calculus, and the implications of their calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses frustration with the differentiation process and seeks clarification on how to calculate the derivative of 4x(16-x^2)^0.5.
  • Another participant suggests that maximizing the area can be simplified by maximizing the square of the area instead.
  • A participant outlines the differentiation process using the product rule and chain rule, providing a partial derivative expression.
  • There is a claim that the only important zero for the derivative is at 2(2)^0.5, but this is not universally accepted.
  • One participant attempts to derive a relationship between x and y, concluding that x=y, which implies the rectangle is a square.
  • Another participant corrects a previous claim about the mathematical proof, indicating that the conclusion drawn (0=16) is incorrect and highlights the need for proper algebraic manipulation.
  • A later reply humorously questions the necessity of calculus for the derived conclusion, suggesting a misunderstanding of the mathematical process involved.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the differentiation process or the implications of their findings. There are competing interpretations of the results, particularly regarding the relationship between x and y and the validity of the mathematical proof presented.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the differentiation steps and the implications of their calculations. There are unresolved mathematical steps and assumptions that affect the conclusions drawn.

Tiiba
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
I did this three times, and always come up with utter nonsense.

What is the derivative of 4x(16-x^2)^0.5?
(Root of (16 minus x-squared) by 4x.) What are its zilches? How did you calculate that?



This derivative is part of the solution to this problem: "What are the dimentions of the largest rectangle (by area) inscribable in a circle with radius 4?"

I drew the circle and the square (see attachment), divided the square into four parts, drew a diagonal through one, and called it a hypotenuse, which is equal to 4. X and y are the sides of the mini squares. A = 4xy (since there are 4 mini-squares). Then I used Pythagoras to come up with that equation above. But I can't differentiate it now...

The final answer is supposed to be 32 square units.
 

Attachments

  • galactica.gif
    galactica.gif
    1.6 KB · Views: 604
Physics news on Phys.org
you can differentiate it, just keep trying, or you could make your life easier: the maximizing the area is the same as maximizing the square of the area.
 
Tiiba said:
What is the derivative of 4x(16-x^2)^0.5?
(Root of (16 minus x-squared) by 4x.) What are its zilches? How did you calculate that?

Use the product rule and chain rule. I'll get you started:

(d/dx)(4x(16-x^2)^0.5)=4((16-x^2)^0.5)+(4x)(...

As for the zeros, the only important one is 2(2)^.5

Tiiba said:
This derivative is part of the solution to this problem: "What are the dimentions of the largest rectangle (by area) inscribable in a circle with radius 4?"

matt grime is right, it ends up being a square, but you should start with a rectangle to prove it to yourself.

Tiiba said:
I drew the circle and the square (see attachment), divided the square into four parts, drew a diagonal through one, and called it a hypotenuse, which is equal to 4. X and y are the sides of the mini squares. A = 4xy (since there are 4 mini-squares). Then I used Pythagoras to come up with that equation above. But I can't differentiate it now...

Sure you can, finish the above differentiation, simplify and then find a root that makes sense in this problem. Use the root to find y and then you'll know the area (which is, as you stated, 32 square units).

Good Luck,

Kevin
 
homology said:
(d/dx)(4x(16-x^2)^0.5)=4((16-x^2)^0.5)+(4x)(...
(d/dx)(4x(16-x^2)^0.5)=4((16-x^2)^0.5) - (4x^2)(16-x^2)^.5 =

-4x^2
-------------- + 4sqrt(16-x^2) = 0;
sqrt(16-x^2)

4x^2
-------------- = 4sqrt(16-x^2) = 0;
sqrt(16-x^2)

4x^2 = 4(16-x^2)

x^2 = 16 - x^2

0 = 16

BTW, this means x = sqrt(16-x^2), which is y.
So x=y, and if this is a square, that's perfectly true.

So there you have it: a full mathematical proof that 0=16.
 
Last edited:
Tiiba said:
(d/dx)(4x(16-x^2)^0.5)=4((16-x^2)^0.5) - (4x^2)(16-x^2)^.5 =

-4x^2
-------------- + 4sqrt(16-x^2) = 0;
sqrt(16-x^2)
The above is good

4x^2 = 4(16-x^2)

x^2 = 16 - x^2
This is bad. "add" x^2 to both sides to get 2(x^2)=16 which yields x=2sqrt(2) and not 0=16
So there you have it: a full mathematical proof that 0=16.
So there you have it: a full mathematical proof that you can't add
:biggrin:

Cheers,

Kevin
 
You needed calculus to prove THAT?

God, I'm sure glad I'm not studying arithmetic any more.
 
Last edited:
10 = 2 really
I mean:

102=210

1*2^1+0*2^0=2*10^0
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
12K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K