| Thread Closed |
Eigenpairs and Hermitian matrices |
Share Thread |
| Oct22-09, 05:22 PM | #1 |
|
|
Eigenpairs and Hermitian matrices
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
Choose [tex]\lambda_{1}, \lambda_{2}, \lambda_{3} [/tex] along with a set of vectors [tex]{v_{1},v_{2},v_{3}}[/tex] and construct an Hermitian matrix H with the eigenpairs [tex] (\lambda_{1},v_{1}),(\lambda_{2},v_{2}),(\lambda_{3},v_{3})[/tex] 2. Relevant equations 3. The attempt at a solution [tex] \lambda_{1} = 2[/tex] [tex]\lambda_{2} = -2[/tex] [tex]v_{1} = \widehat{i}+2\widehat{j}[/tex] [tex]v_{2} = \widehat{i}-2\widehat{j}[/tex] [tex]u_{1} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{5}}\left(\widehat{i} + 2\widehat{j} \right)[/tex] [tex]u_{2} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{5}}\left(\widehat{i} - 2\widehat{j}\right)[/tex] [tex]v_{3} = u_{1} \times u_{2} = -\frac{4}{5}\widehat{k}[/tex] [tex]u_{3} = -\widehat{k}[/tex] [tex]Basis: \ U = \left\{ u_{1},u_{2},u_{3} \right}\}[/tex] [tex]H = \left| \begin{array}{ccc} 2 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & -2 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 \end{array} \right| [/tex] How does this look? |
| Oct23-09, 01:10 AM | #2 |
|
Recognitions:
|
can you choose any values here?
why not just [tex] \lambda_{1} = 1 [/tex] [tex] \lambda_{2} = 2 [/tex] [tex] \lambda_{3} = 3 [/tex] and [tex] u_{1} = (1,0,0)[/tex] [tex] u_{2} = (0,1,0)[/tex] [tex] u_{3} = (0,0,1)[/tex] then [tex]H = \left| \begin{array}{ccc} 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 2& 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 3 \end{array} \right| [/tex] |
| Oct23-09, 07:42 AM | #3 |
|
|
If that's all this is, am I misunderstanding or is this a really trivial question?
|
| Oct23-09, 01:34 PM | #4 |
|
Recognitions:
|
Eigenpairs and Hermitian matrices
maybe it asking if you are given arbitrary
[tex] u_1, u_2, u_3 [/tex] and corresponding eigenvalues [tex] \lambda_1, \lambda_2, \lambda_3 [/tex] can you find a hermitian matrix H, with the given eigenpairs? one way you could do is assume you have found H and it can be diagonalised (which you know it can, from the eigenvectors), then the diagonal form of H is [tex] D = P^{-1}.H.P[/tex] where [tex]D = \left| \begin{array}{ccc} \lambda_1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & \lambda_2& 0 \\ 0 & 0 & \lambda_3 \end{array} \right| [/tex] now the matrix P is simply given by the eigenvectors where [tex]P = \left| \begin{array}{ccc} u_1, u_2, u_3 \end{array} \right| [/tex] then H is [tex] H = PDP^{-1}[/tex] that gives the eigenpairs, however I doubt it would automatically be hermitian... for that you need, where the star means conjugate transpose [tex] H = H^* [/tex] so running that through [tex] PDP^{-1} = (PDP^{-1})^* = P^{-1}^*D^*P^* = P^{-1}^*DP^* [/tex] hmmm... not totally sure where to go now |
| Oct23-09, 02:40 PM | #5 |
|
Recognitions:
|
maybe a little left & right muliplication
[tex] D = P^{-1}(PDP^{-1})P = (P^{-1}P^{-1}^*)D(P^*P) [/tex] this will be satisfied if P is unitary [tex]P^*P = PP^* = I[/tex] |
| Oct23-09, 02:56 PM | #6 |
|
Recognitions:
|
from before P is given by the eigenvectors (choose up to some multiplicative constant)
[tex]P = \left| \begin{array}{ccc} u_1, u_2, u_3 \end{array} \right| [/tex] so in subscript form if j is the eigenvector and i is it's component, write [tex]P = P_{ij} = u_{j}^{(i)}[/tex] now for the transpose conjugate of a matrix [tex]P^* = (P^*)_{ij} = \bar{P}_{ji} = \bar{u}_{i}^{(j)} [/tex] matrix multipication is given by (with summation over the repeated indice) [tex]P^*P = (P^*)_{ij}P_{jk} = \bar{u}_{i}^{(j)} u_{k}^{(j)} [/tex] which looks just like a complex inner product between eigenvectors so to satisfy the unitary condition we were looking for [tex]PP^* = I \rightarrow \bar{u}_{i}^{(j)} u_{k}^{(j)} = \delta_{ik} [/tex] ie. all the columns of P must form an orthonormal basis, which is a property of unitary matricies in general. So the condition will be satisfied if you just normalise your eigenvectors to length 1. got a bit carried away there... but from this you should be able to write the general form of H no worries |
| Oct24-09, 10:01 AM | #7 |
|
|
Ok that helps. I guess I got confused and thought he was looking for D, but I think you're right; I think he's looking for PDP-1
Thanks! |
| Thread Closed |
Similar discussions for: Eigenpairs and Hermitian matrices
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| traceless hermitian matrices form groups? | Advanced Physics Homework | 5 | ||
| Linear Algebra: Hermitian Matrices | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 4 | ||
| Matrices - unitary matrices | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 6 | ||
| hermitian matrices | Quantum Physics | 11 | ||
| Linear Algebra - Hermitian matrices | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 6 | ||