nickdk
- 16
- 0
Is it possible to create a strong enough (artificial) magnetic field to stop high energy particles? Much like the Earth's magnetic field stops high energy particles.
The discussion centers on the feasibility of creating an artificial magnetic field strong enough to stop high energy particles, drawing parallels to the Earth's magnetic field. It explores theoretical and practical aspects, including confinement techniques and the behavior of charged particles in magnetic fields.
Participants express differing views on the definitions of "stopping" versus "confining" particles, and there is no consensus on whether a magnetic field can effectively stop high energy particles. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of varying versus constant magnetic fields.
Limitations include the dependence on definitions of "stopping" and "confining," as well as the unresolved nature of the mathematical principles involved in the proposed scenarios.
jtbell said:"Confining" and "stopping" are not the same thing.
If by "stopping", nickdk means "bringing to rest" or "making stationary", it's impossible for a magnetic field (by itself) to do that, because the magnetic force on a (charged) particle is always perpendicular to the particle's motion. It cannot change the particle's speed, only its direction of motion.
The OP asked Is it possible to create a strong enough (artificial) magnetic field to stop high energy particles?, not strong enough constant magnetic field.Bob_for_short said:We speak of a constant magnetic field, not of varying one. dB/dt = rotE, so it is E that actually makes this work.