What is the original purpose of the Laplace-Runge Lenz vector?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter BobG
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lenz Vector
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the original purpose of the Laplace-Runge-Lenz (LRL) vector, its implications in central force problems, and its relationship to symmetries in physics. Participants explore theoretical aspects, historical context, and mathematical interpretations related to the LRL vector, particularly in the context of orbital mechanics and quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Historical
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the completeness of the LRL vector in calculating an orbit's eccentricity, suggesting that it may have originally been intended for a different method of determining eccentricity.
  • Another participant discusses the deeper symmetry of central force problems, noting that the LRL vector indicates a larger symmetry algebra and an additional conserved quantity, despite the lack of a clear physical interpretation for this quantity.
  • A participant references the work of Delande and Gay, and Dieter Wintgen, indicating that their research includes discussions on the symmetry of the hydrogen atom with respect to the LRL vector.
  • There is mention of a connection to representations of specific Lie groups and the work of Demeyer, Vanden Berge, and Fack, suggesting a broader mathematical framework related to the discussion.
  • One participant offers to share their dissertation, which includes a primer on Lie algebra and its relation to the LRL vector.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the original purpose and completeness of the LRL vector, with some focusing on its mathematical implications and others on its historical context. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the initial intent behind the LRL vector and its applications.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various mathematical frameworks and historical interpretations, but the discussion does not clarify the assumptions underlying the use of the LRL vector in different contexts.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in the mathematical foundations of classical mechanics, quantum mechanics, and the historical development of symmetry in physics may find this discussion relevant.

BobG
Science Advisor
Messages
364
Reaction score
87
What was the original purpose of the Laplace Runge Lenz vector?

I understand the components (comparing centrifugal force to gravitational force) and, more importantly, that if you multiply the LRL by the reciprical of the geocentric gravitational constant (or helio..., etc), you get a vector that points towards perigee in a magnitude that tells you your eccentricity.

But, as is (before you convert to the eccentricity vector), it seems to be incomplete? If it was designed to calculate an orbit's eccentricity, you would think he would have divided out the geo/helio/etc centric constant right off the bat. The only thing I can think of is that a different method, independent of a geocentric gravitational constant, used to be used to find the eccentricity and that, if the eccentricity were already known, the LRL vector might have been used to calculate the geocentric gravitational constant?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The idea is that central force problems have a deeepr symmetry than SO3.
The LRL vector shows that this is so.
It was noted that since it commuted with the hamiltonian (possion brackets there i guess, classically) there was a larger symmetry algebra and another conserved quantity. Though there was no good physical interpretation of this quantity it ws considred valauble form the standpoint of symmetry

There's actually a very cool way to derive the modes of spherical problems using it and Pauli used it to look at the Schrödinger eq for spinless non rel hydrogen. I did an undergrad project that devloped this method in modern language and showed that subgroups of SO4 (interesting ones) abound in the simple Schrödinger problem despite the fact that QM books say nothing about it.


Sternberg makes some lame comments about this in his otherwise pretty cool book "Group Theory and Physics" but if you want more details let me know and i can point you to some obscure papers that i once dug up.
 
Last edited:
I suggest reading the work by Delande and Gay, as well as Dieter Wintgen. My dissertation has a very-readable appendix devoted to the symmetry of the hydrogen atom with respect to the Runge-Lenz vector, and I can email anyone interested a copy.
 
Cool.
Does it include discussion of representations of S0(4,2) ~ S0(2,1) X S0(4)?
I believe the related work of Demeyer, Vanden Berge and Fack is collected in a book of papaers presented at the 15th internatrional Coloquim on Group Theoretical Methods in Physcis.
 
Yes, to your question. It also includes a complete primer on Lie algebra.
 
Hello John,

I have a colleague who is interested in your thesis, and trying to track it down.

I hope this can find it's way...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K