Ball coordinates to cartesian coordinates

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around converting spherical coordinates (r, theta, phi) to Cartesian coordinates (x, y, z). Participants are exploring the conversion process and addressing potential confusion regarding the notation of angles.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty in converting spherical coordinates to Cartesian coordinates and seeks clarification on the process.
  • Another participant suggests that the equations for conversion might be useful, but notes a potential interchange of the angles theta and phi between physics and mathematics contexts.
  • A different participant recommends visualizing the problem through drawing or modeling to better understand the relationships between the quantities involved.
  • Further discussion highlights the inconsistency in notation for angles in different fields, with some participants emphasizing the importance of specifying conventions used.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants acknowledge the confusion surrounding the notation of angles but do not reach a consensus on the best approach to the conversion process or the implications of the notation differences.

Contextual Notes

There is an unresolved issue regarding the interchange of angles theta and phi, which may affect the interpretation of the conversion equations. The discussion also reflects varying conventions in different disciplines.

martine
Messages
27
Reaction score
1
I am struggeling with the following problem:

give the x,y,z coordinates from the following ball points/vectors

1. (r, theta, phi) = (sqrt3, 3/4pi, 3/4pi)

2. (r, theta, phi) = (1, 1/6pi, 1 1/6pi)

the sollutions I found in my reader are as followed:

1. (x, y, z) = (-1/2 sqrt3, 1/2 sqrt3, -sqrt3/sqrt2)

2. (x, y, z) = 1/4 sqrt3, -1/4, 1/2 sqrt3)

can someone explain to me what was actually done here? I understand the conversion from carthesian coordinates to ball and cylinder coordinates but I can't seem to find the sollution for the other way around. Thanks a lot.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
These equations might be of some use...
 
Muzza said:
These equations might be of some use...

Yep. It seems the angles [tex]\theta[/tex] and [tex]\phi[/tex] are interchanged though.
It's funny. In my physics books the azimuthal angle is always [tex]\phi[/tex] and in most of my mathematics books it's [tex]\theta[/tex].
Oh well, guess it doesn`t matter as long as you're aware of it.
 
I would suggest that, instead of plugging this into a set of "conversion equations", you draw the situation (or even build a little model with a box) so that you see how the quantities are related. Once you do this with one problem, the second will be much easier.
 
Galileo said:
Yep. It seems the angles [tex]\theta[/tex] and [tex]\phi[/tex] are interchanged though.

It brings this up.

Unfortunately, the convention in which the symbols [tex]\theta[/tex] and [tex]\phi[/tex] are reversed is frequently used, especially in physics, leading to unnecessary confusion.

:P
 
That's because notation is not as important as meaning, but we must always specify.

Using astronomy language, I always used [tex]\theta[/tex] for "declination" (angle from vertical axe) and [tex]\phi[/tex] for "Right ascension" (angle from horizontal axe from left to right)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K