Particles travelling back in time

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kurious
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particles Time
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Particles in quantum field theory can be conceptualized as traveling backwards in time, a notion primarily popularized by Richard Feynman. This idea serves as a computational aid, simplifying complex field theory calculations. The discussion raises questions about the validity of this representation in reality, particularly regarding the distance scales at which such behavior ceases to be acceptable. Additionally, the concept of symmetry is highlighted as a fundamental principle connecting various scientific systems, from the periodic table to gauge theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum field theory
  • Familiarity with Feynman diagrams
  • Knowledge of particle-antiparticle relationships
  • Basic concepts of symmetry in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of quantum distance scales on particle behavior
  • Study Feynman diagrams and their role in simplifying quantum calculations
  • Investigate the relationship between symmetry and physical laws in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the significance of antiparticles in quantum field theory
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum field theorists, and students interested in the intersection of time travel concepts and particle physics.

kurious
Messages
633
Reaction score
0
In quantum field theory particles are said to travel backwards in time.
I assume this is allowable over quantum distance scales.Over what kind of distance scale does such particle behaviour stop?
And if it happened when the universe as a whole had a radius equal to the quantum distance scale, would a particle traveling backwards in time still be acceptable to theorists? What was the motivation for having particles traveling backwards in time in the first place? And how is this sort of time travel compatible with the fact that I always see a clock traveling forwards in time?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If I do not mistake then anti-particles are particles that are traveling backwards in time, and by this we save the symmetrical picture between particles and anti-particles.
 
Feynman's use of "travelling backwards in time"made a basically technical issue easier to understand. From Dirac's genius we learned that negative energy electrons are, in fact positrons. What Feynman did was to take the minus sign from the energy in the standard exp(i(-E)t - ipx) so that he got exp(iE(-t)-px) , so a positive energy positron is a positive energy electron traveling backwards in time. This ingenious trick made field theory computations much, much easier that they were before his diagrams. His idea of traveling backwards in time is basically a computational aid.

Regards,
Reilly Atkinson
 
Reilly said:
"Feynman's idea of traveling backwards in time is a computational aid."

Kurious writes:

Saying that it is a computational aid suggests to me that it is not a valid representation of reality and so is not a technique that should be used.
 
Symmetry concept is maybe the most meaningful concept in abstract and non-abstract systems.

By symmetry we sometimes can find the deep connections that exist between so-called different things.

We have learned during the last 100 years that the power of simplicity that is expressed through symmetry can be found in the basis of many interesting abstract and non-abstract systems, for example:

Mendeleyev periodic table (http://www.nfinity.com/~exile/periodic.htm),

Hadrons family (http://www.egglescliffe.org.uk/physics/particles/hadron1/hadron1.html),

Fibonacci series (http://goldennumber.net/links.htm),

Gauge theory (http://www.britannica.com/nobel/micro/228_45.html ).

In this address http://math.arizona.edu/~models/Topology/source/2.html
You can see how the symmetry which stands in the basis of a Donut, can be transformed to a Cofee cup, and vise versa.

The physical laws of nature are also described in terms of symmetry and broken symmetry states.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 125 ·
5
Replies
125
Views
8K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K