Thread Closed

Lost in Symmetry and Super Symmetry

 
Share Thread
Dec16-09, 11:30 AM   #1
 

Lost in Symmetry and Super Symmetry


Not getting symmetry at all. I keep reading over and looking for various materials on the subject, but I still can not seem to fully grasp it. Could someone explain what symmetry means in quantum mechanics in a way that a new learner can grasp?

This question also applies to super-symmetry.

Thanks!
PhysOrg.com physics news on PhysOrg.com

>> Is there an invisible tug-of-war behind bad hearts and power outages?
>> Penetrating the quantum nature of magnetism
>> Rethinking the universe: Groundbreaking theory proposed in 1997 suggests a 'multiverse'
Dec16-09, 03:44 PM   #2
 
Mentor
That subject isn't very easy, but this post might be useful. It could at least help you understand what a symmetry is. Chapter 2 of Weinberg's QFT book is also a pretty good place to learn about symmetries.
Dec16-09, 03:47 PM   #3
 
Quote by Fredrik View Post
That subject isn't very easy, but this post might be useful. It could at least help you understand what a symmetry is. Chapter 2 of Weinberg's QFT book is also a pretty good place to learn about symmetries.
Thanks a ton!
Dec16-09, 04:46 PM   #4
 
Recognitions:
Science Advisor Science Advisor

Lost in Symmetry and Super Symmetry


Quote by 1Truthseeker View Post
Not getting symmetry at all. I keep reading over and looking for various materials on the subject, but I still can not seem to fully grasp it. Could someone explain what symmetry means in quantum mechanics in a way that a new learner can grasp?

This question also applies to super-symmetry.

Thanks!
You need to understand what symmetry means in classical physics first. Try to read post #10 in
www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=145080

then go on and read the other posts in that thread.

regards

sam
Dec17-09, 09:52 AM   #5
 
After doing some reading, I have found what it essentially means. In a nutshell it means that the mathematical expressions of QM are "precise" to the definition of the phenomenon, unlike classical symmetry, which are approximations.

My question now becomes, what is the reasoning that the the QM equations are symmetrical to nature, apart from statistical proof from experiments? Isn't it going a bit far to say that these equations are 100% exact to nature? This would necessitate infinite precision.

I ask this from a mathematical standpoint, not an ontological one.
Thread Closed

Similar discussions for: Lost in Symmetry and Super Symmetry
Thread Forum Replies
what is the difference between dynamical symmetry and geometrical symmetry? Classical Physics 5
Chiral symmetry breaking and approximate flavour symmetry High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics 8
super lost!!!!!!!!!! Introductory Physics Homework 3
super symmetry Beyond the Standard Model 4
Gauge symmetry and symmetry breaking High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics 2