Logarithm Problems: Simplifying Expressions and Solving Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter KnowledgeIsPower
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logarithm
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around logarithmic problems, specifically simplifying logarithmic expressions and solving logarithmic equations. Participants are addressing two main questions involving logarithmic identities and properties, as well as exponential equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the change of base rule for logarithms and question how to manipulate logarithmic expressions. There are discussions about simplifying equations and the implications of different forms of logarithmic expressions. Some participants express uncertainty about the application of logarithmic properties and how to approach the quadratic form that arises from the equations.

Discussion Status

Several participants have provided guidance on how to approach the problems, including suggestions for using the change of base rule and recognizing the structure of the equations. There is an acknowledgment of different interpretations of the equations, and some participants have successfully solved one of the problems while still seeking clarity on the other.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of homework assignments, which may limit the information they can share. There is a focus on understanding logarithmic properties and their applications without providing direct solutions.

KnowledgeIsPower
Messages
89
Reaction score
1
I've just introduced myself to logarithms and have done most of the questions, but am having trouble with one or two of them:

Q1: Find values of x for which:
Log(to base 3)x - 2log(to base x)3 = 1.

I have no idea where to start on this question.


Q2: Solve:
25^x = 5^(x+1) -6.
On this question, i know it can be simplified to give:
25^x = 5(5^x) - 6
However, if i let y=5^x, what would 25^x be? It's not 5y, as 5(5^x) is 5y.

Thanks for any help.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Q1: Use the change of base rule to convert [itex]\log_x{3}[/itex] to some base 3 (or both to base 10 if you prefer) log.

Do you know your rules of logs? Do you know what to do with a coefficient in front of a log?

Q2: Is it supposed to be written as

[tex]25^x = 5^{(x+1)} -6[/tex]

or

[tex]25^x = 5^{(x+1) -6}[/tex]
 
Q2 is the first one. The -6 is completely separate and not part of the logarithm.
 
Q1: Log(base3)x - 2log(basex)3 = 1
Log(base3)x - log(basex)9 = 1.
(Lgx/lg3) - (lg9/lgx) = 1 ?

( (lgx)^2 - (lg9)(lg3) )/(lg3)(lgx) = 1 ?
(lgx)^2 - (lg9)(lg3) = (lg3)(lgx)
I'm not sure how i would evaluate that.
 
Last edited:
okay, well its been a little while since I've done logs, but I'm pretty sure this is how it goes...

remember the properties of logarithms:
log(x)^y = ylogx
is one of them, i remember, and I'm sure there's one regarding multiplication, but its not coming ot me at the moment.

good luck
 
KnowledgeIsPower said:
Q1: Log(base3)x - 2log(basex)3 = 1
Log(base3)x - log(basex)9 = 1.
(Lgx/lg3) - (lg9/lgx) = 1 ?
That looks OK.

( (lgx)^2 - (lg9)(lg3) )/(lg3)(lgx) = 1 ?
(lgx)^2 - (lg9)(lg3) = (lg3)(lgx)
I'm not sure how i would evaluate that.
Let u = lg x. Then the above becomes

u2 - u lg(3) - lg(9)lg(3) = 0

which you can solve using the quadratic equation.
 
KnowledgeIsPower said:
Q2: Solve:
25^x = 5^(x+1) -6.
On this question, i know it can be simplified to give:
25^x = 5(5^x) - 6
However, if i let y=5^x, what would 25^x be? It's not 5y, as 5(5^x) is 5y.
Note that 25x = (52)x = (5x)2. Then let y = 5x as you suggest and you end up with a quadratic which you should know how to solve.
 
Thanks for the help. I managed to solve the second one thanks tot he quadratic equation. For some reason i thought (5^x)^2 would give 25^2x. (In a similar manner to how (5x)(5x) gives 25x^2)

I'll do the other one now, thanks.

Say you have Log(baseA)B. When converting to a different base this can become (log(basez)(B)) / (log(basez)(A))

Where base Z is any base you like, such as e or 10 ?
Thanks.
 
KnowledgeIsPower said:
Say you have Log(baseA)B. When converting to a different base this can become (log(basez)(B)) / (log(basez)(A))
Yes, if you mean what I think you mean:

[tex]\log _A B = \frac{\log _z B}{\log _z A}[/tex]
 
  • #10
Thats the one, thanks.
Just proof, a little integration i haven't done yet and numerical methods before I've finished this book >_<.
 
  • #11
KnowledgeIsPower said:
Say you have Log(baseA)B. When converting to a different base this can become (log(basez)(B)) / (log(basez)(A))
What I do whenever I forget a particular equation (like all those crazy trig. identities) is derive them. For the equation in question,
[tex]\begin{align*}<br /> x &= x \\<br /> a^\log_a{x} &= b^\log_b{x} \\<br /> (b^{\log_b{a}})^\log_a{x} &= b^\log_b{x} \\<br /> b^{\log_b{a}\log_a{x}} &= b^\log_b{x} \\<br /> \log_b{a}\log_a{x} &= \log_b{x} \\<br /> \log_a{x} &= \frac{\log_b{x}}{\log_b{a}}<br /> \end{align}[/tex]

Easy as eating cake.
 
  • #12
For the first problem, there is no need to use the change of base rule. Just call [tex]~~log_3 ~x = y ~~[/tex] and the rest follows simply enough.
 
Last edited:
  • #13
I got it and finished that chapter, thanks for the help.
Deriving does help sometimes, if you can do it for that particular formula easily enough. An example is the double angle to single angle formulae - which are just based from sin(a+b) etc.
Just a quick, small question on some integration - volumes of revolution. On a 360 degrees (2pi) revolution you would multiply the final integrated product by pi. On a 180 degrees revolution you would multiply the final integrated product by pi/2 ?
 
  • #14
KnowledgeIsPower said:
Just a quick, small question on some integration - volumes of revolution. On a 360 degrees (2pi) revolution you would multiply the final integrated product by pi. On a 180 degrees revolution you would multiply the final integrated product by pi/2 ?
Not exactly sure what you're saying. If you have some function revolved [itex]\theta[/itex] about the x-axis from a to b, then the volume is:

[tex]\int _a ^b \frac{\theta}{2} [f(x)]^2 dx[/tex]

Why is it like this?

[tex]\frac{\theta}{2} [f(x)]^2 = \frac{\theta}{2\pi}\pi [f(x)]^2[/tex]

[itex]\pi [f(x)]^2[/itex] is the area of a circle of radius f(x), but since you don't have a full circle, only a sector of a circle, then the area of the sector should be smaller than the area of the full circle by the ratio that the angle is smaller than the full angle (2[itex]\pi[/itex]). That's where the [itex]\frac{\theta}{2\pi}[/itex] comes in. So that gives you the cross sectional area of your little cylinder, then you multiply by the width, [itex]dx[/itex], and then add the volumes of all those cylinders from x=a to x=b.

So, if by "final integrated product" you meant:

[tex]\int _a ^b [f(x)]^2 dx[/tex]

then yes, you're right, but I have no idea why "final integrated product" would mean that. Well, I'm not sure why you use the word "product", and what you mean by "final." I'm not sure why you'd start by doing that integration first, then multiplying by the angle, it seems you'd put all that in the integration.
 
Last edited:
  • #15
That's what i meant. Now i can work it out for any angle. Thanks.
Sorry for the bad wording, i'll have to look up how to use the mathematical notation sometime.
In the book I am working out of Pi is usually left to the left of the integration sign and applied after the limited have been applied but there's really no difference.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
44
Views
8K