Register to reply

Moment Inertia of a cube

by Cosmossos
Tags: cube, inertia, moment
Share this thread:
Cosmossos
#1
Jan12-10, 08:22 AM
P: 100
To which of the two cubes has a larger moment of inertia?
Click image for larger version

Name:	untitled.JPG
Views:	36
Size:	5.3 KB
ID:	23012
I think it's the right one, is it correct?
How can I explain that without using the parallel axis theorem?
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Fungus deadly to AIDS patients found to grow on trees
Canola genome sequence reveals evolutionary 'love triangle'
Scientists uncover clues to role of magnetism in iron-based superconductors
berkeman
#2
Jan12-10, 12:10 PM
Mentor
berkeman's Avatar
P: 40,947
Quote Quote by Cosmossos View Post
To which of the two cubes has a larger moment of inertia?
Attachment 23012
I think it's the right one, is it correct?
How can I explain that without using the parallel axis theorem?
Why do you say the right one? Are you familiar with the relevant equation for calculating the moment of inertia?
Cosmossos
#3
Jan12-10, 01:01 PM
P: 100
what relevant equation?

I think it's the right one because We know that the minimal moment of inertia is throw the principal axes that goes throw the center of mass. in the right one , the rotation isn't throw the principal axes . there is also the following theorem :

The moment of inertia about an arbitrary axis is equal to the
moment of inertia about a parallel axis passing through the
center of mass plus the moment of inertia of the body about
the arbitrary axis, taken as if all of the mass M of the body
were at the center of mass.

Am I wrong?

berkeman
#4
Jan12-10, 04:05 PM
Mentor
berkeman's Avatar
P: 40,947
Moment Inertia of a cube

Quote Quote by Cosmossos View Post
what relevant equation?

I think it's the right one because We know that the minimal moment of inertia is throw the principal axes that goes throw the center of mass. in the right one , the rotation isn't throw the principal axes . there is also the following theorem :

The moment of inertia about an arbitrary axis is equal to the
moment of inertia about a parallel axis passing through the
center of mass plus the moment of inertia of the body about
the arbitrary axis, taken as if all of the mass M of the body
were at the center of mass.

Am I wrong?
There may be a shortcut way to tell which has a higher moment of inertia, but for me, I'd need to calculate it. I'd use the standard definition of the Mmoment of inertia, and evaluate thge integral for the diagonal case. I don't think you can use the parallel axis theorm, since the two axes are not parallel.

I'd do the 2-D case first, to see if it offered some intuition. That is, the moment of inertia for a flat rectangular sheet, with the axes going straight versus diagonal.
vela
#5
Jan12-10, 04:58 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 11,726
I think they'll turn out to be equal. Try computing the moment of inertia tensor.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Area moment of inertia and second moment of inertia Mechanical Engineering 1
Hollow cube - moment of inertia Introductory Physics Homework 15
What tis hte difference betweeen mass moment of inertia and inertia Classical Physics 11
Second Moment of Inertia - Area Moment of Inertia Classical Physics 1
What are moment of inertia, mass moment of inertia, and radius of gyration? Introductory Physics Homework 1