What is the connection between state of mind, death, and the song we sing?

  • Thread starter Thread starter yesicanread
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Death Mind State
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion explores the philosophical connection between music, thought, and the concept of death. The original poster posits that both music and thought consist of two parts: the fundamental expression and the inspirational feeling. They question whether, after death, individuals become a singular essence or retain their duality, drawing parallels to the triangle inequality theorem to illustrate their reasoning. The conversation highlights the challenges of conveying complex ideas clearly, particularly when integrating abstract concepts like inspiration and mathematical principles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic philosophical concepts related to life and death
  • Familiarity with the triangle inequality theorem in mathematics
  • Knowledge of the role of music in human expression
  • Ability to analyze abstract reasoning and its implications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the philosophical implications of death in works by Shakespeare and Greek philosophers
  • Explore the relationship between music and emotional expression in psychology
  • Study the triangle inequality theorem and its applications in various fields
  • Investigate methods for improving clarity in philosophical writing and reasoning
USEFUL FOR

Philosophers, musicians, psychologists, and anyone interested in the intersection of art, thought, and existential questions.

yesicanread
Messages
142
Reaction score
0
- We sing. In this there is a 2 part sum = the song.
That's my postulate.

Now in this song. The second part is the inspirational feeling.

- Music expresses our humanity, and is our link to other singing things like birds n stuff.

- Thought expresses our humanity, and is also a link to the Earth's life.

So thought has 2 level's as well. One of which is inspiration.

- If when we die. Do we become just one level ? The 1st part of lifes music that leads to others inspiration. Like Shakespear or the Greek philosophers ?

Or do we keep being two parts ? One part of which is inspirational enthusiasm.

- If we become 1 part. We are like a plane. A plane is one part plane. Flat.

But the plane has the triangle inequality theorem. So the flat part, the 1st part, is less than the sum of two added parts. The experience of emotion and thought I reasoned.

- So when we are flat/dead. We have two parts greater than the flat part. And our bodies are experiencing thought, and emotion. Even tough we are flat to those that experience emotion and joy through our works even though we be dead.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yesicanread said:
- We sing. In this there is a 2 part sum = the song.
That's my postulate.

Now in this song. The second part is the inspirational feeling.

- Music expresses our humanity, and is our link to other singing things like birds n stuff.

- Thought expresses our humanity, and is also a link to the Earth's life.

So thought has 2 level's as well. One of which is inspiration.

- If when we die. Do we become just one level ? The 1st part of lifes music that leads to others inspiration. Like Shakespear or the Greek philosophers ?

Or do we keep being two parts ? One part of which is inspirational enthusiasm.

- If we become 1 part. We are like a plane. A plane is one part plane. Flat.

But the plane has the triangle inequality theorem. So the flat part, the 1st part, is less than the sum of two added parts. The experience of emotion and thought I reasoned.

- So when we are flat/dead. We have two parts greater than the flat part. And our bodies are experiencing thought, and emotion. Even tough we are flat to those that experience emotion and joy through our works even though we be dead.

I'm sorry, but I must have some kind of block built against your reasoning.. I cannot understand what you are trying to say here.. The moment I think I understand what you are talking about, you come up with the triangle inequality theorem and how it relates to death. You may want to think about your grammar a bit more next post. At least for my sake so I can have a better time understanding your posts. thanks
 
Ad Infinitum NAU said:
I'm sorry, but I must have some kind of block built against your reasoning.. I cannot understand what you are trying to say here.. The moment I think I understand what you are talking about, you come up with the triangle inequality theorem and how it relates to death. You may want to think about your grammar a bit more next post. At least for my sake so I can have a better time understanding your posts. thanks

I try very hard to be speak clearly, and am happy with the effort put forth so far.

Obviously my grammar is poor. Oh well. :surprise:

I'm sorry, but I'm trying as best I can. I ask people define the exact problem in my texts so I may define that grammar better than the problem grammar, as well I use math to put forth a reasoning tool to test and understand my reasoning.

If you don't undrstand a part, define the problem in the sentence you don't understand, and I'll try to get that part more clear and understandable to read.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
500
Views
96K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K