Calculating Time Dilation: A Lorentz Transformation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating time dilation using the Lorentz transformation in the context of special relativity. Participants explore the implications of time experienced by an observer traveling at relativistic speeds compared to a stationary observer, with specific reference to a scenario involving 6 days for the traveler and 15 billion years for the observer at rest.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant requests the equation for time dilation, specifically asking how fast one must travel to experience 6 days while 15 billion years pass for someone at rest.
  • Another participant provides the Lorentz transformation equation and performs calculations to derive the speed required, expressing it in terms of the speed of light.
  • A different perspective suggests that to "see" 6 days go by, one could theoretically travel slightly faster than the Earth's rotation, implying a different interpretation of time passage.
  • Some participants discuss the implications of their calculations and the feasibility of the scenario presented, including the limitations of human lifespan and practical travel constraints.
  • There is a mention of a book that attempts to reconcile scientific concepts with religious beliefs, which leads to a brief discussion on the intersection of science and religion.
  • Several participants express challenges with using Mathematica for precise calculations, discussing issues with rounding and seeking assistance on how to achieve more accurate results.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the use of the Lorentz transformation for calculating time dilation, but there are multiple interpretations and approaches to the scenario presented. The discussion includes both technical calculations and philosophical considerations, with no consensus on the implications of the findings.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the mathematical tools and methods used for calculations, indicating potential limitations in their understanding or the software capabilities. The discussion also touches on the complexities of reconciling scientific and religious viewpoints, which remains unresolved.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying special relativity, time dilation, or mathematical modeling in physics, as well as individuals exploring the philosophical implications of science and religion.

woodysooner
Messages
174
Reaction score
0
Can someone help me with this,

How fast, or should I say near the speed of light would someone have to be to see in their time only 6 days go by, but to someone at rest relative to them see 15 billion years.

You don't have to work it just give me the equation. Is it just the lorentz transformations.

Cheers Woody

to the mentors sorry if you think I'm implying anything with the 6 days please no more warning lol.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes it is just the Lorentz transformation:

[tex]t=\frac{t_0}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}[/tex]

For the sake of simplicity I'll ignore leap days.
t=15 billion years*365 days/year*24 hours/day*60 minutes/hour*60 seconds/minute=473040000000000000s
t0=6 days*24 hours/day*60 minutes/hours*60 seconds/minute=518400s
v will be expressed in terms of c, so c=1.
A little algebra reveals that:

[tex]v=\sqrt{c^2(1-\frac{t_0^2}{t^2})}[/tex]

The resulting value for v is: 0.999999999999999999999999399512104c

Someone feel free to check me on that.
 
Last edited:
woodysooner said:
How fast, or should I say near the speed of light would someone have to be to see in their time only 6 days go by,
In order to "see" 6 days go by, the person cannot leave the Earth's orbit, as he he would no longer be able to see the day go by.

I suggest that a person travel in an airplane ever so slightly faster than the Earth's rate of revolution, and in an opposite direction. Thereby, it could take 15 billions years for him to see 6 revolutions of the Earth go by. THis is assuiming that he doesn't run out of gas or life first.

but to someone at rest relative to them see 15 billion years.
For someone to see 15 billion years go by, he would have to have been at rest, and buried, for all of it.
 
thanx

thanx a lot last one standing. yeah in 15 billion years person on Earth would die i know that, i think you see where i was going with the six day 15 billion years, not that I'm religious it's just my friends don't think that relativity can explain the discepancy of the days vs years so i wanted to show them that it did.
 
Hmm...that is an interesting way of looking at it. I'm Christian, so who knows lol
 
Last one standing, i have a gift from heaven for you, read Gensis and the Big Bang, not sure who wrote it i just let a friend borrow it but its new like within past two years and you can get it at any book store normally in stock, you will love it. My mom is anti-science extreme christian and that poses big problems for people like you I and all on this forum because that is what drives the world and we know it, but this book takes science and shows how relativity is in the bible and a lot of other good stuff.

Hope this helps and you read it, its a short fast easy read also.

Cheers
Woody
 
Thanks woody, I'll be sure to check that out. Yes, I definitely know what you're talking about. Basically I call myself an old Earth creationist, not because I care either way but because young Earth creationists tend to be stubborn and practically call us Bible compromising heretics. At any rate, I'm getting completely off the topic of this thread so I'll stop before I get a reprimand from a mod. Thanks again and glad I could help.
 
There will be no more religious talk in this thread. Anything further will be deleted.

- Warren
 
sorry

I didn't mean for it to be like that, just wanted to explain the book I won't do that anymore, I tried when i asked the question to know say anything religious.

sorry
 
  • #10
yes sorry. didn't mean for it to it go on like that. forget about the rule there, won't happen again warren.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
lastonestanding, everything check out just fine with that, equation and all but what did you use a calculator or what, I have even tried mathmatica and i can't keep it from rounding i want what you have the exact answer. show me how.
 
  • #12
Assuming you use windows, the system calculator goes to over 30 digits.
 
  • #13
woody,

Did you use Mathematica's N operator? N[Pi, 1000], for example, will show you a thousand digits of pi.

- Warren
 
  • #14
I stayed up all night near 8 hours learning mathematica with this prob, but no chroot that only for numbers out past the dec. once something is past 6 0's it rounds to 0 even with the N[]

maybe i don't know how to use it right but i looked at over 50 tutorials.

help me

and systm calc just goes to 30 right??
 
  • #15
I don't have Mathematica on this computer, but you're saying:

N[Sqrt[299792458.0^2 * (1-(518400.0^2/473040000000000000.0^2))],50]

doesn't work as expected?
 
  • #16
nope

gives 2.99792458*^8 then if you divide by c wow you get 1 lol which i don't want so i have no clue. I have the newest mathematica too.
 
  • #17
I'll take a look at it when I get home. I don't have Mathematica here.

- Warren
 
  • #18
Make sure when you divide by c you're also using the N operator there:

N[%/299792458.0, 50]

- Warren
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 101 ·
4
Replies
101
Views
8K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K