Thread Closed

Lipschitz functions dense in C0M

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Feb11-10, 05:33 PM   #1
 

Lipschitz functions dense in C0M


I'm working on Pugh's book on analysis and there's this problem that should be very easy to solve. It's asking to show that the set of continuous functions, [tex]f:M \rightarrow R, f\in C^{Lip}[/tex] obeying the Lipschitz condition (where M is a compact metric space):

[tex]|f(a) - f(b)| \leq L d(a,b)[/tex] for some L, for every a and b belonging to to M.

Show that the above is dense in [tex]C^{0}(M,R)[/tex]. My attempt is to use the Stone-Weirestrass theorem. That is to show that the set [tex]C^{Lip}[/tex] vanishes nowhere and separates points. The latter is easy for me, I just showed how the above equation implies that f(a) does not equal f(b) if a does not equal b. However, showing the vanishing property is proving difficult. Is there some trick I'm supposed to use? Hm...

Also, I assume I'll have to actually show that [tex]C^{Lip}[/tex] is infact a function algebra; that is, it obeys the 3 properties that makes something that (closed under addition, constant multiples, and multiplication), but I can't seem to manipulate the equations in such a way that shows the Lipschitz property implies those.

Any help is appreciated. Thank you.
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> King Richard III found in 'untidy lozenge-shaped grave'
>> Google Drive sports new view and scan enhancements
>> Researcher admits mistakes in stem cell study
Feb12-10, 10:06 AM   #2
 
The Stone-Weierstrass theorem is applicable to subalgebras, so you must show first that the LIpschitz functions are indeed a subalgebra of [itex]C^{0}\left(M,\mathbb R \right)[/itex]. This is not difficult, for the multiplication, start with:

[tex]\left|f\left(a\right)g\left(a\right)-f\left(b\right)g\left(b\right)\right|[/tex]

Then add and subtract [itex]f\left(a\right)g\left(b\right)[/itex], expand and use the fact that the functions are continuous and defined in a compact space.

Now, there are some things I don't understand in your question:

That is to show that the set vanishes nowhere ...
This is indeed necessary for the locally compact version of the theorem but, as you have a compact metric space, you only need to show that your set contains the constant functions.

The latter is easy for me, I just showed how the above equation implies that f(a) does not equal f(b) if a does not equal b.
How did you prove that?
Thread Closed
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Lipschitz functions dense in C0M
Thread Forum Replies
Is this derivative Lipschitz? Calculus 2
Lipschitz functions Calculus & Beyond Homework 9
Sequences of Lipschitz Functions Calculus & Beyond Homework 1
Lipschitz Continuity Calculus & Beyond Homework 2
Lipschitz condition Calculus & Beyond Homework 2