whydoyouwanttoknow
- 39
- 0
How fast do you have to be going before you would be said to have a relativistic velocity?
The discussion revolves around the concept of "relativistic velocity" and seeks to determine at what speed an object is considered to be moving at a relativistic velocity. Participants explore the implications of relativistic effects, particularly time dilation, across various speeds and contexts.
Participants express differing views on what constitutes a relativistic velocity, with no consensus on a specific speed threshold. The discussion highlights the subjective nature of defining relativistic effects based on context and application.
Participants mention various speeds and contexts (e.g., GPS satellites versus everyday vehicles) without resolving the implications of these examples on the definition of relativistic velocity. The discussion reflects a range of assumptions about the significance of relativistic effects at different speeds.
selfAdjoint said:The dilations happen at all speeds, even 3 mph. The question is when does the size of the dilations become of interest to you?
Yep. So even saying .1C is incomplete: it depends on the situation.whydoyouwanttoknow said:So your average GPS sat. is going at a relativistic speed because if you didn't take time dilation into account they'd give you the wrong position? But for the rest of us who cares that our car is going 60kph?