Register to reply 
Lagrangian of a free particle 
Share this thread: 
#1
Mar210, 01:17 AM

P: 7

Hello,
I'm trying to follow an argument in Landau's Mechanics. The argument concerns finding the Lagrangian of a free particle moving with velocity v relative to an inertial frame K. (of course L=1/2 mv^2, which is what we have to find). I'll state the points of the argument: (0) It has already been argued that the Lagrangian relative to an intertial frame K must be of the form L(v^2) (space is homogeneous and iostropic). (1) If an inertial frame K is moving with infinitesimal velocity e relative to another inertial frame K', the Lagrangian L' must be of the same form because the equations of motion are unchanged under Galilean transformations. (2) So the Lagrangian L' wrt K' must differ by L by at most a time derivative of some f(q,t). (3) L' = L(v'^2) = L(v^2 + 2v*e + e^2) which is to firstorder [tex]L(v'^2) = L(v^2) + (\partial L/\partial v^2) 2 v\cdot e[/tex] (4) The second term in the last equation is a total time derivative only if it is a linear function of the velocity v. Hence [tex]\partial L/\partial v^2[/tex] is independent of the velocity. I.e. the Lagrangian is proportional to the square of the velocity. I'm having trouble with (2) and (4). Specifically, my question for (2) is that it has been proven L and L' differing by a time derivative of some f(q,t) (q is a vector of generalized coordinates) does not change the solutions of the equations of motion, but the other way around. Thus 'must differ' in (2) isn't true. I guess 'allowed to differ' is more correct. My question for (4) is that I don't get it. :) Thanks evoluciona 


#2
Mar210, 06:24 AM

P: 449

Hi.
I am not good at English, so I cannot distinguish the meanings of "must differ by at most" and "allowed to differ". If [tex] (\partial L/\partial v^2) [/tex] = a0 + a1v + a2v^2 + ... [tex] (\partial L/\partial v^2) 2 v\cdot e [/tex] = 2a0ve + 2a1v^2e + 2a2v^3 e+ ... = 2a0 dr/dt e + 2a1 (dr/dt)^2 e + 2a2 (dr/dt)^3 e + ... Only the first term is the time derivative of the function, say f=2a0re. Regards. 


#3
Mar210, 08:13 PM

P: 7

Thank you! evoluciona 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Relativistic Lagrangian of a Free Particle  Special & General Relativity  6  
Lagrangian of a particle moving on a cone  Introductory Physics Homework  10  
The Lagrangian for a free particle  Classical Physics  3  
Lagrangian for free particle  Classical Physics  1  
Derive the Lagrangian of a free nonrelativistic particle  Classical Physics  4 