Dirty Bombs: The History and Potential Impact of Radioactive Weapons

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter quarkman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nuclear
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of dirty bombs, particularly in the context of recent concerns about nuclear material theft and its implications for terrorism and warfare. Participants explore the potential ease of acquiring radioactive materials and the associated risks, as well as the historical context of using harmful materials as weapons.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern about the ease of stealing weapons-usable nuclear material and its implications for dirty bombs, referencing an article on illicit trafficking.
  • Another participant suggests that a dirty bomb requires radioactive material and a conventional explosive, indicating a basic understanding of its components.
  • A different participant questions the harmfulness of radioactive waste, suggesting that it may not be as dangerous as portrayed in the media, while also expressing a preference for other forms of harmful materials.
  • One participant provides a resource link for further information on dirty bombs, indicating a desire for more reliable information.
  • A later reply discusses the risks associated with creating a dirty bomb and notes the potential emotional impact it could have on affected communities, drawing a historical parallel to the use of rotting carcasses as weapons in ancient warfare.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of concern about the accessibility of radioactive materials and the implications for public safety. There is no consensus on the actual risks posed by dirty bombs or the effectiveness of such weapons, indicating multiple competing views.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference the influence of media on public perception of nuclear threats and the historical context of using harmful materials as weapons, but there are unresolved questions regarding the actual dangers of radioactive waste and the feasibility of constructing a dirty bomb.

quarkman
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
I ask this question in lieu of the recent thread on the Manhattan Project and the problems with terrorism and wars currently going on around the world. I have read the article "Illicit Trafficking of Weapons-Usable Nuclear Material" in the July 2004 APS NEWS (Back Page) and I am concerned that this type of material appears this easy to steal and sell on the black market. The article cites poor knowledge of radioactive materials and fear of embarassment as factors (among other things) which aid this theft. I wonder how easily this stuff could be made into a bomb and how this could relate to a "dirty bomb" which I hear mentioned in the news a whole lot lately. Does anyone have good links for info on dirty bombs and nuclear theft? I hate to trust what I read in the paper and in non-scientific print media, as well as on television. The article above seems to think that innacurate media attention is part of the problem anyway. Thanks for any info.

-D
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dirty bomb. All you need is something radioactive (like enough to harm people) and a conventional explosive afaik.
 
Hmmmm...Now if weapons grade material is as easy to steal as the aforementioned article makes it appear, then it must be pretty easy to get your hands on some radioactive waste. This is disheartening! Hopefully "waste" is not that harmful and the press just makes it sound real dangerous. I know little about the harmfulness of radioactive waste, but I would think you could blow other stuff up, like toxic gas to much greater adverse effects on people. And my friends wonder why I hide in my "physics hole" with books and a pencil, the world is so sucky right now
 
quarkman said:
I ask this question in lieu of the recent thread on the Manhattan Project and the problems with terrorism and wars currently going on around the world. I have read the article "Illicit Trafficking of Weapons-Usable Nuclear Material" in the July 2004 APS NEWS (Back Page) and I am concerned that this type of material appears this easy to steal and sell on the black market. The article cites poor knowledge of radioactive materials and fear of embarassment as factors (among other things) which aid this theft. I wonder how easily this stuff could be made into a bomb and how this could relate to a "dirty bomb" which I hear mentioned in the news a whole lot lately. Does anyone have good links for info on dirty bombs and nuclear theft? I hate to trust what I read in the paper and in non-scientific print media, as well as on television. The article above seems to think that innacurate media attention is part of the problem anyway. Thanks for any info.

-D
It would be hard to make an effective dirty bomb without putting yourself at risk as well. But even an ineffective dirty bomb would have a pretty big emotional impact. I know I wouldn't buy property there afterward.

In the 'weapons' categories, this kind of 'dirty' bomb has a long history, dating back to the days of catapults. Except, obviously, they didn't have the technology to launch radioactive material. They had to resort to launching rotting horse or cattle carcasses that ripened in the sun for a few days. That was sure to lower morale on the other side for awhile.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
13K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
11K