Thread Closed

Predicting which atoms radiate first in radioavtive materials

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Apr12-10, 04:04 PM   #1
 

Predicting which atoms radiate first in radioavtive materials


I wonder if there is any theoretical knowledge how to predict which atoms will decay first in given radioactive substance? I was asking about this in school and teacher said it is not possible to predict this...i doubt this proccess is random...
Thanks
 
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
physics news on PhysOrg.com

>> Promising doped zirconia
>> New X-ray method shows how frog embryos could help thwart disease
>> Bringing life into focus
Apr12-10, 04:31 PM   #2
 
Recognitions:
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Your teacher is right. Quantum theory underlies what happens, so there is no way of knowing in advance which atom will decay next.
 
Apr12-10, 04:34 PM   #3
 
Admin
This is as random as random random can be.
 
Apr12-10, 04:36 PM   #4
 

Predicting which atoms radiate first in radioavtive materials


Yeah, but nothing in nature is random...there must be some laws behind that...they are just waiting to be discovered. It wonders me no one tried predicting this in theory.
 
Apr12-10, 04:48 PM   #5
 
Admin
Quote by niggasnopec View Post
Yeah, but nothing in nature is random...there must be some laws behind that...they are just waiting to be discovered. It wonders me no one tried predicting this in theory.
Actually a lot of things in nature are random. Sure, one day we may find there is some hidden, deeper structure responsible for non-randomness af the randomness that we see, but so far there is no reason to assume such thing exists. We have about 100 years of tests confirming randomness of the quantum world.

And you are not the first one to think this can't be true. This is an old discussion, google "God does not play dice".
 
Apr12-10, 04:54 PM   #6
 
I know, but if you can describe it with mathematics and have all parameters you can predict it...maybe just parameters are so "weird". Kinda like it was with motion of planets until they simplified it...
Anyway thanks for replying
 
Apr12-10, 04:57 PM   #7
 
Admin
Ah, the quest for hidden parameters. We've been there, we tried it, we failed.
 
Apr12-10, 05:04 PM   #8
 
Maybe someday...I must say I don't have much knowledge of physics, just in last grade of highschool, although I am taking final exams in physics. Highscool physics is just not interessing as it may be...
 
Apr13-10, 02:01 AM   #9
 
Quote by niggasnopec View Post
Maybe someday...I must say I don't have much knowledge of physics, just in last grade of highschool, although I am taking final exams in physics. Highscool physics is just not interessing as it may be...
you have the same prejudice as Einstein: "God does not play dice"

maybe it would be useful for you to study the birth of Quantum physics?
 
Apr13-10, 12:40 PM   #10
 
I said maybe...maybe not.
 
Apr19-10, 08:33 AM   #11
 
Quote by Borek View Post
Ah, the quest for hidden parameters. We've been there, we tried it, we failed.
How exactly have we failed?
How can scientists disprove hidden parameters?
 
Apr19-10, 09:16 AM   #12
 
Admin
We failed to find them. Doesn't mean they don't exist, I have stated it earlier - but so far there is no reason to believe they do exist.
 
Thread Closed

Tags
decay, half life, prediction, radioactive
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Predicting which atoms radiate first in radioavtive materials
Thread Forum Replies
Why doesn't the electron radiate? Quantum Physics 10
To radiate or not to radiate Special & General Relativity 63
What do we radiate? General Physics 25
When does a charge radiate? Special & General Relativity 55
Do black holes radiate? General Astronomy 6