Is the Earth's Thermal Output Constant Compared to Other Interstellar Cores?

Click For Summary
The Earth's thermal output is approximately 44 TeraWatts, primarily dissipated through conduction and convection, with radiation playing a negligible role. The geothermal heat flux from the core is about 0.09 W/m2, significantly lower than the solar energy absorbed at the surface, which is over 160 W/m2. The total outward energy flow from the Earth includes contributions from convection, latent heat of evaporation, and radiation, totaling around 160 W/m2. Comparatively, the Earth's thermal output is relatively constant but vastly overshadowed by solar radiation. Overall, the geothermal flux is several orders of magnitude less than the energy flows from the Sun.
dirtyd33
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Is the thermal output, or rather electromagnetic output, of the Earth's core relatively constant? and if so, how does it compare to the output of other interstellar cores, say like mercury or the sun?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Which one are you asking? Thermal output or electromagnetic (i.e. radiative) output?

For cores, this is very different. The thermal energy of the core would be dissipated by conduction and convection as well as radiation...The radiative aspect of this transport is actually not efficient since the Earth is opaque.
 
Matterwave said:
The thermal energy of the core would be dissipated by conduction and convection as well as radiation...

My answer to you is yes. I meant the total thermal output of the earth, from the core outward. I want to know if it is fairly constant/ continuous and what might it's capacity be. But now I think of it I'd like to know just the radiative aspect separately, as well.
 
dirtyd33 said:
My answer to you is yes. I meant the total thermal output of the earth, from the core outward. I want to know if it is fairly constant/ continuous and what might it's capacity be. But now I think of it I'd like to know just the radiative aspect separately, as well.

The total rate of thermal energy coming up from below the Earth's surface is about 44 TeraWatts.
  • Pollack, H.N.; S. J. Hurter, and J. R. Johnson (1993), http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/1993/93RG01249.shtml, Rev. Geophys. 30 (3): 267–280

This is a heat flow mainly by conduction and convection; radiation has essentially no role below the surface.

This energy flux has only a negligible contribution to the much larger heat fluxes above the surface, which are dominated by radiation from the Sun.

The geothermal heat flux from the core works out to be a bit under 0.09 W/m2, which is negligible by comparison with the energy absorbed from the Sun, which works out to be a bit over 160 W/m2.

The energy absorbed at the surface then flows up through the atmosphere and eventually out into space. The outward energy flows are about 17 W/m2 by convection, 80 W/m2 by latent heat of evaporation, and about 63 W/m2 by radiation (radiation here being the difference between thermal radiation upwards and thermal backradiation from the atmosphere). The geothermal flux is several orders of magnitude less than the energy flows above the surface.

Cheers -- sylas
 
I recently purchased a lunar clock intended as a Christmas present for a young family friend who has become interested in astronomy. The clock face shows twelve images of the Moon in all its main phases, with the Full Moon depicted at the "twelve o'clock" position. Now I purchased this clock especially early to allow time to check on its accuracy. After waiting for a full lunar orbit to occur, I have since discovered that the clock time when measured relative to its lunar images (that's to...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K