Particular Integral of arctan example

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter relinquished™
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Example Integral
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the indefinite integral of the function \(\int \frac{dx}{(2x^2 + 2x + 5)}\), specifically focusing on the method of completing the square and the substitution involved in deriving the integral's solution. Participants explore the correctness of the proposed solution and the techniques for completing the square.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a solution involving completing the square and substitution, leading to an expression involving arctan.
  • Another participant points out confusion regarding the substitution of variables, suggesting that the correct substitution should be \(u = x + \frac{1}{2}\) rather than \(u = (x + \frac{1}{2})^2\).
  • There is a discussion on how to complete the square, with a suggestion that \(p\) and \(q\) can be derived from the coefficients of the quadratic expression.
  • Several participants express uncertainty about the correctness of the original solution and identify mistakes in variable substitution and expression simplification.
  • A later reply acknowledges the mistakes and proposes a corrected form of the answer, while still seeking confirmation on the overall approach.
  • One participant appreciates the original approach but suggests that they would have used a different method, indicating a variety of perspectives on solving the integral.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correctness of the original solution. There are multiple competing views regarding the proper method of substitution and the completion of the square, with some participants correcting earlier claims while others express uncertainty.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved issues regarding the correct substitution and the method for completing the square, as well as the implications of these choices on the final expression for the integral.

relinquished™
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
I know for a fact that

[tex] \int \frac{(du)}{(a^2 + u^2)} = \frac{1}{a} \cdot arctan \frac{u}{a} + C[/tex]

I was given the problem of solving the indefinite integral of

[tex] \int \frac{(dx)}{(2x^2 + 2x + 5)}[/tex]

First, I multiplied the integral by (1/2) / (1/2) to eliminate the coefficient of the x^2 in the denominator, so now I am left with

[tex] \frac{1}{2} \cdot \int \frac{(dx)}{(x^2 + x + \frac{5}{2})}[/tex]

Now, in completing the square of the denominator, I added [tex]\frac{1}{4} - \frac{1}{4}[/tex] (which is zero) so that the equation would look like this:

[tex] = \frac{1}{2} \int \frac{dx}{x^2 + x + \frac{5}{2} + \frac{1}{4} - \frac{1}{4}}[/tex]

Simplifying, I got:

[tex] = \frac{1}{2} \int \frac{dx}{x^2 + x + \frac{1}{4} + (\frac{5}{2} - \frac{1}{4})}[/tex]

[tex] = \frac{1}{2} \int \frac{dx}{(x + \frac{1}{2})^2 + \frac{9}{4}}[/tex]

[tex] = \frac{1}{2} \int \frac{dx}{(x + \frac{1}{2})^2 + ( \frac{3}{2})^2}[/tex]

If we let [tex](x + \frac{1}{2})^2 = u^2[/tex] and [tex]( \frac{3}{2})^2 = a^2[/tex] we now have the integrable form stated above, so

[tex] = \frac{1}{2} \int \frac{du}{u^2 + a^2}[/tex]

[tex] = \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{2}{3} \cdot arctan \frac{u}{a} + C[/tex]

[tex] = \frac{1}{3} \cdot arctan \frac{x^2 + \frac{1}{2}}{\frac{3}{2}} + C[/tex]

[tex] = \frac{1}{3} \cdot arctan \frac{2(x^2 + \frac{1}{2})}{3} + C[/tex]

My questions are:
(1) Is this the correct solution?
(2) If my solution is correct, how do you get the necessary constant in order to make the denominator of this problem a complete square? the (1/4 - 1/4) I added to the denominator just popped out of my mind. Is there any way to get it without resorting to trial and error?

thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) No, there seems to be some confusion regarding the subsitution of variables, you've chosen (x + 1/2)^2 = u^2, this means that u = x + 1/2, not u = (x + 1/2)^2.

2) Suppose you wanted to write x^2 + bx + c in the form (x + p)^2 + q, i.e. you want to choose p, q such that x^2 + bx + c = (x + p)^2 + q = x^2 + 2px + p^2 + q. Comparing coefficients on both sides of the equation gives 2p = b and p^2 + q = c. So you can take p = b/2 and q = c - p^2 = c - (b/2)^2.
 
Last edited:
When I was doing this I found trying to complete all the quadratic equations I had by completing the square rather than any other method. Either actually solving them or just putting them in the form [itex]a(x+b)^2 + c[/itex], remember good algebra techniques greatly help calculus.
 
Muzza said:
1) No, there seems to be some confusion regarding the subsitution of variables, you've chosen (x + 1/2)^2 = u^2, this means that u = x + 1/2, not u = (x + 1/2)^2.

um... since [tex]u^2 = ( x + \frac{1}{2} )^2[/tex] you can directly place this in the integrable form because the form needs a [tex]u^2[/tex],

but I understand the process of solving the quadratic eq'n or completing the square. thanx.

I was just wondering if the answer I got was correct.
 
relinquished™ said:
um... since [tex]u^2 = ( x + \frac{1}{2} )^2[/tex] you can directly place this in the integrable form because the form needs a [tex]u^2[/tex],

but I understand the process of solving the quadratic eq'n or completing the square. thanx.

I was just wondering if the answer I got was correct.
In the final two steps you have ended up replaces u with [itex]x^2 + 1/2[/itex], that was the only mistake I think.
 
You also picked the wrong u originally. But then when you went to substitute you put in the right one. But later when you replaced u with x you went back to the wrong u.
 
ahh.. ok, I see the mistake. Sorry. And the title should be Particular Integral that yields arctan. My mistake as well...

the u should be

[tex]u = x + \frac{1}{2}[/tex]

and the real answer should be

[tex]= \frac{1}{3} \cdot arctan \frac{2(x + \frac{1}{2})}{3} + C[/tex]


thanx again for the clarifications and replies. ^_^
 
Last edited:
I like your approach though; I probably would have used a ugly trig sub. I should probably memorize a few of the basic integral in tables.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K