Is it Possible that 1 Equals -1: A Mathematical Inquiry?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter olek1991
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mathematical inquiry of whether 1 can equal -1, exploring concepts related to complex numbers, square roots, and the properties of exponents. Participants engage in a mix of theoretical reasoning and clarification of mathematical principles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a proof suggesting that 1 equals -1 through manipulations involving complex numbers and square roots.
  • Another participant challenges the proof by highlighting the misapplication of square roots, specifically the principal square root definition which only yields positive values for real numbers.
  • Concerns are raised about the validity of certain exponentiation rules when applied to negative bases and non-integer exponents.
  • Discussion includes the representation of complex numbers in polar coordinates, with a participant explaining how this relates to the properties of the imaginary unit i.
  • There is a clarification that the square root function is defined to return only non-negative outputs, which is crucial for maintaining the function's uniqueness.
  • Participants express confusion and request simpler explanations of complex number properties and the implications of the square root function.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the initial claim that 1 equals -1. There are multiple competing views regarding the validity of the mathematical manipulations presented, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on definitions of square roots and exponentiation, as well as the unresolved nature of the mathematical steps leading to the claim that 1 equals -1.

olek1991
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I think that I have proof of 1 being -1 and I can't find any flaw in it.
Could you please take a look?

-1=i² =>
(-1)²=(i²)² =>
1 = i^4 => take the square root both sides
1 = i²

i² = -1 v i² = 1

Thus proving
1 = -1
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
To confuse you a little more can you find the mistake: 2=\sqrt{4}=\sqrt{(-2)^2}=-2.
 
Yea I know those too xD
Does that mean that it is correct? (but just not used since it's crazy)

Edit: the √(-2)² is not -2, but 2 btw :P
You probably meant (-2)² = √4 = 2²
 
Last edited:
No I meant exactly what I wrote, the root cancelling the square. We can't do this because we have defined taking the square root of a real number to be a positive value. This is called the principal square root. For the complex numbers this principal root is defined as \sqrt{z}=\sqrt{|z|}e^{i \pi/2}. In general for complex numbers it is not even true that \sqrt{zw}=\sqrt{z}\sqrt{w}.
 
a^{bc}=\left(a^b\right)^c is not generally true. For example \left(\left(-1\right)^2\right)^{\frac 1 2}\neq-1. You should be careful with this rule when the base is not a positive real number and the exponent is not an integer.
 
Cyosis said:
No I meant exactly what I wrote, the root cancelling the square. We can't do this because we have defined taking the square root of a real number to be a positive value. This is called the principal square root. For the complex numbers this principal root is defined as \sqrt{z}=\sqrt{|z|}e^{i \pi/2}. In general for complex numbers it is not even true that \sqrt{zw}=\sqrt{z}\sqrt{w}.

I really don't get that O.o
Could you dumb it down a little? (I'm a collage student)
 
We can write every complex number z in the form z=|z|e^{i \theta} with |z| the distance between z and the origin and \theta the angle between the x-axis and |z| (polar coordinates). If you have had some complex numbers you should know this representation of a complex number. From this it follows that i=e^{i \pi/2} and i^4=e^{2 \pi i}. Now taking the square root of i^4 we get \sqrt{i^4}=e^{i \pi}=-1.
 
olek1991 said:
Yea I know those too xD
Does that mean that it is correct? (but just not used since it's crazy)

Edit: the √(-2)² is not -2, but 2 btw :P
You probably meant (-2)² = √4 = 2²

No that's not what it means, all of our mathematical foundations would be bogus if we ever said "it's true, but it's too crazy.. so it's pretty much false".
Sqrt(x) is a function (input/output relationships are unique), so given a number (perhaps 9), Sqrt(9) will map to 3.. never -3. If Sqrt(9) could be either -3 OR 3, it wouldn't be a function. Even though (-3)^2 = 9 = (3)^2, the root function is defined to take positive values and produce positive values.


Edit: the √(-2)² is not -2, but 2 btw :P
You probably meant (-2)² = √4 = 2²

This is exactly what you kind of said.. sqrt( (-2)^2 ) is indeed 2 since (-2)^2 gives us 4, and by the definition of the function, we will get the positive possible "root" only.

"You probably meant (-2)² = √4 = 2²" You probably made some typing mistake here.. (-2)^2 = sqrt(4) = 2^2?? 4 = 2 = 4? I don't know
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
230K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K