Interacting virtual particles?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the differences between electric and magnetic fields from the perspective of quantum field theory (QFT) and quantum electrodynamics (QED). Participants explore concepts related to virtual particles, field interactions, and the implications of relativity on electromagnetic fields.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the fundamental quantum differences between electric and magnetic fields, suggesting that spin and polarization may play a role.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between the 4-potential and the electric and magnetic fields before delving into QFT.
  • A participant proposes that the electric and magnetic moments of fundamental particles are interconnected, suggesting that one cannot discuss one field without considering the other.
  • There is a claim that magnetic fields can be viewed as electric fields resulting from length contraction in general relativity, with a specific example involving a current-carrying wire mentioned.
  • Another participant asserts that magnetic fields are observer-dependent phenomena arising from relative motion with electric charges, linking this to the principles of relativity.
  • Questions are raised about the possibility of a photon having spin=0, with a distinction made between states involving photons and fermions.
  • A participant expresses uncertainty about their reasoning, questioning whether their thoughts are valid or misguided.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of electric and magnetic fields, with some suggesting a relativity-based interpretation while others focus on quantum mechanics. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing perspectives present.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference classical electromagnetism and the relationship between fields and potentials, indicating a need for clarity on these foundational concepts. There are also indications of unresolved assumptions regarding the interplay between quantum mechanics and relativity.

Marjan
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
static fields - quantum picture

I am trying to understand quantum field theory & QED but i am having problems, because i don't find specific answer:

What is the real quantum difference between electric and magnetic field?

Maybe in spin of virtual photons (1, 0, -1)? But then what is polarization of light?! Or is the key here electric & magnetic momentum of a particle?!? Help :confused:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Marjan said:
I am trying to understand quantum field theory & QED but i am having problems, because i don't find specific answer:
What is the real quantum difference between electric and magnetic field?

Could you elaborate on what specifically you're asking ?
The EM "field" in QFT is usually taken to be the 4-potential A_mu. If you understand well how A_mu is related to the electric and magnetic fields (a prerequisite before hoping to understand the quantum version of electromagnetism) then I don't understand your question, because the relationship is the same.
If you don't understand that relationship, then you should first learn more about classical EM. Does the field tensor F_mu,nu tells you something ?

cheers,
Patrick.
 
Try to work out the moments and their potentials.
 
Ok, like vanesch said - one step back!

Magnetic momentum of single fundamental (lets take electron) particle is pm = g*e*(1/2 hbar)/(2*m), where g is approx. 2.

Electric dipole(!) momentum of electron and positron is pe = e*l, where l is distance between them. And pe is oriented opposite of E field.
So, is the electric momentum of a single particle pe = e*x, where x is "size" of fundamental particle?!

Am i right? If so, I just proved that fundamentally we can't talk about just one of the fields (like magnetic or electric), because every fundamental particle have mass and charge, so it have also el. AND magn. momentum.
And then i guess: B = M / pm and E = M / pe or something like that?! :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
What is the real quantum difference between electric and magnetic field?

Acutally magnetic fields are really electric fields that arise due to length contraction in general relativity. There is a really good example that describes this involving the magnetic field created by a wire with current running through it. I'll try to find it on-line.
 
Holy s*it, you are right. I think I just bumped into Quantum Physics / General Relativity problem. One or the other, but not both together!

Two points:

(1) Magnetic field is born just for observer who is in relative motion according to electric charge. So magnetic field is just a side effect of relativity. Even more: Magnetic field's origin is in (general) relativity!

(2) Is spin=0 of photon possible state? Yes, but only in sistem of other photons or gravitons. No way for fermions.

---
Do you see that it's all fine, if we examine problem through relativity OR through quantum physics?! But can't both!
 
Entropy, did you have something like that in mind: ]Field Relativity.[/URL]

I draw that picture, it is little funny, but try to understand what i am trying to say :bugeye:

It is up to observer if he will measure field or energy (-> also mass)!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Do I have a point or am I just going crazy? :surprise:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K