Thread Closed

Hey Neanderthals :)

 
Share Thread
May7-10, 06:36 AM   #1
 
Talking

Hey Neanderthals :)


Just thought i'd share:

Neanderthals, Humans Interbred—First Solid DNA Evidence


http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...bred-dna-gene/


"The next time you're tempted to call some oaf a Neanderthal, you might want to take a look in the mirror.


According to a new DNA study, most humans have a little Neanderthal in them—at least 1 to 4 percent of a person's genetic makeup."




I think this is a fairly important discovery that everybody has been waiting for. Cheers...

neanderthals
PhysOrg.com science news on PhysOrg.com

>> City-life changes blackbird personalities, study shows
>> Origins of 'The Hoff' crab revealed (w/ Video)
>> Older males make better fathers: Mature male beetles work harder, care less about female infidelity
May7-10, 06:44 AM   #2
 
How is this evidence more convincing and conclusive than all the other DNA evidence already found exactly?

I've long been in favour of H. s. neanderthalensis by the way, in fact, I am in favour of H. pan in lieu of Pan as a genus, in fact, I am in favour of reclassifying Homo sapiens sapiens as Pan homo cultiuatus.

Homo sapiens sapiens is one of the most ridiculous self-stroking trinominal nomenclatures ever invented. What if our decendants grow even more intelligent, what do you get then? Homo plusapiens? We were the first hominids to develop culture and states which I think is a very significant property, thus we should be called Homo cultiuatus and rather so even Pan homo cultiuatus. There are enough species in one genus that differ a lot more genetically than Humans and Chimps.
May7-10, 07:56 AM   #3
 
Mentor
Quote by Kajahtava View Post
How is this evidence more convincing and conclusive than all the other DNA evidence already found exactly?

I've long been in favour of H. s. neanderthalensis by the way, in fact, I am in favour of H. pan in lieu of Pan as a genus, in fact, I am in favour of reclassifying Homo sapiens sapiens as Pan homo cultiuatus.

Homo sapiens sapiens is one of the most ridiculous self-stroking trinominal nomenclatures ever invented. What if our decendants grow even more intelligent, what do you get then? Homo plusapiens? We were the first hominids to develop culture and states which I think is a very significant property, thus we should be called Homo cultiuatus and rather so even Pan homo cultiuatus. There are enough species in one genus that differ a lot more genetically than Humans and Chimps.
I'm sure homo sapiensn will be chagrined to learn how much of our DNA is mixed in with theirs.

And I'm not surprised to learn about the Neandertal link to us. After all, we have a Zooby and an Ape here at PF.
May7-10, 07:57 AM   #4
 

Hey Neanderthals :)


Quote by Kajahtava View Post
How is this evidence more convincing and conclusive than all the other DNA evidence already found exactly?

What other DNA evidence?
May7-10, 08:27 AM   #5
 
Quote by GeorgCantor View Post
What other DNA evidence?
There have been countless studies already that showed a link.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neander...ing_hypotheses

I think this hypothesis is true by the way, but I just don't see how this new evidence is supposedly more conclusive than the old, which apparently was not conclusive enough yet to sway all biologists.
May7-10, 08:49 AM   #6
 
Quote by Kajahtava View Post
There have been countless studies already that showed a link.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neander...ing_hypotheses

I think this hypothesis is true by the way, but I just don't see how this new evidence is supposedly more conclusive than the old, which apparently was not conclusive enough yet to sway all biologists.


But you said DNA evidence, not hypothesis. What DNA evidence were you referring to?


I could not find DNA analysis in your link that concluded there was interbreeding.


In fact, in my link it states the opposite:

That's no surprise to anthropologist Erik Trinkhaus, whose skeleton-based claims of Neanderthal-modern human interbreeding—previously contradicted with DNA evidence—appear to have been vindicated by the new gene study, to be published tomorrow in the journal Science.



I was always under the opinion that the consensus was that there wasn't interbreeding or that if there was, it would not be to a detectable level.
May7-10, 08:51 AM   #7
 
Homo sapiens sapiens is one of the most ridiculous self-stroking trinominal nomenclatures ever invented.
I think bison bison bison is the worst.
May7-10, 08:57 AM   #8
 
But you said DNA evidence, not hypothesis. What DNA evidence were you referring to?


I could not find DNA analysis in your link that concluded there was interbreeding.


In fact, in my link it states the opposite:

That's no surprise to anthropologist Erik Trinkhaus, whose skeleton-based claims of Neanderthal-modern human interbreeding—previously contradicted with DNA evidence—appear to have been vindicated by the new gene study, to be published tomorrow in the journal Science.



I was always under the opinion that the consensus was that there wasn't interbreeding or that if there was, it would not be to a detectable level.
You seem to be correct, I seemed to have been referring to some things that were later taken back again.

Quote by leroyjenkens View Post
I think bison bison bison is the worst.
There's also Gorilla gorilla gorilla, that's not self-stroking though.
May7-10, 09:05 AM   #9
 
Blog Entries: 1
I'm not too sure about this. Neanderthals didn't paint the walls of their caves like my kids did. None the less, I decided to let my inner Neanderthal show through. I started by dragging my wife into the bedroom by her hair. This was a mistake. It turns out that she has an inner Neanderthal too and access to a club. No wonder they died out.
May7-10, 09:54 AM   #10
 
Recognitions:
Homework Helper Homework Help
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Quote by Kajahtava View Post
There's also Gorilla gorilla gorilla, that's not self-stroking though.
I always wondered if that was just meant as a warning.

Picture some victorian naturalist in the jungle bent over his notes writing down the name
>Gorilla yells his assistant pointing.
hmm. yes
>Gorilla !!!
gorilla gorilla, ok got it
>Gorilla !!!!!!! as his assistant is carried off
gorilla gorilla, gorilla? - well a bit repetitive I suppose,
May7-10, 10:01 AM   #11
 
Etymology
Ancient Greek Γόριλλαι (Gorillai, “a tribe of hairy women”), described by Hanno the Navigator, a Carthaginian navigator and possible visitor to the area that later became Sierra Leone.

I did not know that.
May7-10, 10:17 AM   #12
Evo
 
Mentor
Blog Entries: 4
I dated a guy that had a definite neanderthal brow ridge, no occipital bun though. He always said it was his Cherokee blood.
May7-10, 10:19 AM   #13
 
Recognitions:
Homework Helper Homework Help
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Quote by Kajahtava View Post
Ancient Greek Γόριλλαι
Odd that the Greeks should have such a concise term for hairy women
May7-10, 10:35 AM   #14
 
Quote by mgb_phys View Post
Odd that the Greeks should have such a concise term for hairy women
It was actually the name of a tribe of women, who just happened to be hairy.
May7-10, 10:46 AM   #15
 
Quote by mgb_phys View Post
Odd that the Greeks should have such a concise term for hairy women
Or very appropriate!

May7-10, 10:49 AM   #16
 
Quote by mgb_phys View Post
Odd that the Greeks should have such a concise term for hairy women
I was thinking it more odd that they equated gorillas to hairy women.
May7-10, 10:49 AM   #17
 
Quote by Kajahtava View Post
It was actually the name of a tribe of women, who just happened to be hairy.
Did they also pack a whallop when you got fresh with them?
Thread Closed

Similar discussions for: Hey Neanderthals :)
Thread Forum Replies
Should We Clone Neanderthals ? Biology 16
Are Neanderthals Connected With Humans? Biology 74
Redhead Neanderthals Biology 1
Occipital bunning in neanderthals Social Sciences 6
The Fate Of The Neanderthals Biology 19