Can Changing Gluon Spin to 1/2 Make the Color Force Repulsive?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kurious
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gluons Quarks Spin
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of the color force between quarks and the hypothetical implications of changing gluon spin from 1 to 1/2. Participants explore whether such a change could result in a repulsive force between quarks, examining the characteristics of gluons, the conditions under which the color force can be repulsive, and the theoretical implications of force carriers with different spins.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the color force can be repulsive when two quarks do not form a color singlet, such as when both are red quarks.
  • Others argue that gluons are always bosons with integer spin and question the feasibility of gluons being treated as fermions with spin 1/2.
  • A participant mentions that the strong force becomes repulsive when identical quarks interact, emphasizing the role of quantum numbers.
  • There is a discussion about the interpretation of gluons as quark-antiquark pairs versus independent particles, with some participants expressing confusion over this characterization.
  • One participant suggests that if a quark emits a spin-1/2 fermion, it would change into another type of particle, raising questions about color charge conservation.
  • Another participant introduces the idea that if color fields are carried in bosons as vectors, this could lead to observable effects.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of gluons and the implications of changing their spin. There is no consensus on whether changing gluon spin to 1/2 would result in a repulsive force, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the characterization of gluons and the mechanics of the color force.

Contextual Notes

Some claims depend on specific interpretations of quantum field theory and the nature of force carriers, which are not universally agreed upon. The discussion includes unresolved questions about the properties of gluons and the implications of their spin on the forces between quarks.

kurious
Messages
633
Reaction score
0
Under what circumstances could the colour force ( or the strong residual force) become repulsive between quarks? I've heard that changing the spin of a force carrier can in principle make a force repulsive when it was previously attractive.If gluons exchanged between quarks became fermions with spin 1/2 would this cause a repulsive force between quarks?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The color force can be repulsive as it stands. Let's say you have two quarks that do not form a color singlet (eg, suppose they are both red quarks). Then the force between them is repulsive, and they cannot form a meson.
I am not aware of any theories involving spin-1/2 mediators or how they would look like. Even integer spin (0,2,etc) carriers always convey an attractive force, and odd integer spin carriers can convey either attractive or repulsive forces; it depends on the circumstances.
 
Gluons are a quark-antiquark condensate and thus always have integer spin. They are bosons.

The strong force becomes repulsive when two identical quarks interact. By identical one means : the same quantumnumbers, just as zefram_c pointed out.


regards
marlon
 
Marlon, it is not the first time I read in your posts :
marlon said:
Gluons are a quark-antiquark condensate
Why do you seem to refuse gluons as particles by themselves :confused:
The gluon is analogous to the photon field when it comes to question "who ordered that". The gluon is the gauge field.

Now, of course, the double-lines formalism which allow one to keep track of the color indices tend to suggest the gluon are quark-antiquark pairs. Do you take that seriously :confused:
 
humanino said:
Marlon, it is not the first time I read in your posts :

Why do you seem to refuse gluons as particles by themselves :confused:
The gluon is analogous to the photon field when it comes to question "who ordered that". The gluon is the gauge field.

Now, of course, the double-lines formalism which allow one to keep track of the color indices tend to suggest the gluon are quark-antiquark pairs. Do you take that seriously :confused:


Your first point is completely correct. Maybe my explanation with this quark-antiquarkpair thing is a bit confusing sinve the gluons do not have restmass.

It is because of the way they interact that I state this. i do take that seriously...

regards
marlon
 
Gluons are spin 1 particles, that is why I make this poor analogy.


i won't do this again, since it is indeed confusing...

thanks for the correction humanino
 
I was not really trying to correct you. I mean, if someone wants to question the reallity of those particles, I could not argue easily with him. There is no doubt that the electron is real. But quarks and gluons are never free. So, your opinion on what they really are can only be judged with respect to the computation efficiency of your concepts. The double line formalism is indeed very efficient !
 
kurious said:
If gluons exchanged between quarks became fermions with spin 1/2 would this cause a repulsive force between quarks?
If a quark were to emit a spin-1/2 fermion, by conservation of spin it would change into someother type of particle(a boson with either spin 0 or spin 1). The color charge would also have to go somewhere. If the spin-1/2 particle has color charge, it is probably just a quark. The most well known example of this is pair annihilation; a quark emits a virtual quark and in the process becomes either a photon or a gluon, then the virtual quark is absorbed by an antiquark, which also becomes a photon or a gluon. If the spin-1/2 particle didn't have color charge, the boson that the quark becomes does(AFAIK no bosons with color charge have been experimentally observed).

Any force caused by the interchange of spin-1/2 particles must be an inverse cube force(this can be shown from the fact that the Fourier transform of the propagator has units of length, so after integrating over all 4 momentum components you get units of length-4*length = length-3).
 
jtolliver:
If the spin-1/2 particle didn't have color charge, the boson that the quark becomes does(AFAIK no bosons with color charge have been experimentally observed).

Kurious:
What if the colour field is carried in the boson as vectors like electric and magnetic field vectors? Would those vectors be observable in some way?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
17K