Why Doesn't f(x + Δx) Approach f(x) as Δx Approaches 0 in Limits?

  • Thread starter Thread starter haribol
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limits
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of limits in calculus, specifically addressing why the expression f(x + Δx) does not simply approach f(x) as Δx approaches 0. Participants are exploring the nuances of this limit in the context of derivatives.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the understanding of limits, particularly the behavior of f(x + Δx) as Δx approaches 0. There is a discussion about the implications of the limit resulting in an indeterminate form (0/0) and the need for deeper analysis in such cases.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with some participants providing insights into the nature of limits and derivatives. There is a recognition that the original poster may have misunderstandings about the concept, and others are attempting to clarify the conditions under which limits can be evaluated.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the definition of limits and the implications of encountering indeterminate forms. There is an emphasis on the importance of understanding these concepts for further studies in calculus.

haribol
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
In the attached picture, the equation for the limit I think is:

[tex]\lim_{\Delta x \rightarrow 0} \\\ \frac{f(x+ \Delta x) - f(x)}{\Delta x}[/tex]

When [tex]\Delta x[/tex] approaches 0, why wouldn't the [tex]f(x+ \Delta x)[/tex] approach [tex]f(x)[/tex]? Because as the point Q approaches P, then wouldn't the y value of point Q also approach that of P? Or am I not understanding the concept?
 

Attachments

  • figure1.gif
    figure1.gif
    1 KB · Views: 454
Physics news on Phys.org
haribol said:
In the attached picture, the equation for the limit I think is:

[tex]\lim_{\Delta x \rightarrow 0} \\\ \frac{f(x+ \Delta x) - f(x)}{\Delta x}[/tex]

When [tex]\Delta x[/tex] approaches 0, why wouldn't the [tex]f(x+ \Delta x)[/tex] approach [tex]f(x)[/tex]? Because as the point Q approaches P, then wouldn't the y value of point Q also approach that of P? Or am I not understanding the concept?

You appear to be misunderstanding the concept. And, considering that the concept is that of a "derivative", one of the keys to calculus, you really want to understand it!

Yes, of course, [tex]f(x+ \Delta x)[/tex] approaches [tex]f(x)[/tex]. If it didn't, since the denominator necessarily approaches 0, the limit of the fraction would not exist!

You may be thinking "If the numerator goes to 0, then the limit must always be 0" but that's only true if the limit of the denominator is NOT 0.
If neither numerator nor denominator goes to 0, that's easy: you can take those limits separately and the limit of the fraction is just one over the other.
If numerator goes to 0 and denominator does not, that's easy: the limit of the fraction is 0.
If numerator does not go to 0 and denominator does, that's easy: the limit of the fraction does not exist.
The only "hard" case, and the interesting one, is exactly what is given here: both numerator and denominator go to 0 and we cannot look at the numerator and denominator separately.
 
I don't quite understand you. According to that graph, then the limit is 0/0?
 
Parameterize [tex]\Delta x = x_0 \times p[/tex] as an evolution with parameter [tex]p\rightarrow 0[/tex]. Then if the numerator goes like [tex]f(x+\Delta x) - f(x) \approx s_0 \times p[/tex] you see that the ratio will tend to [tex]\frac{s_0}{x_0}[/tex] which is non-vanishing, although both the numerator and the denominator go to zero.
 
No, the limit is not 0/0- that is an "indeterminant" and it doesn't mean anything. What it means is that if you have a fraction such that both numerator and denominator go to 0, then you have to look more closely.

What is the limit of x2/x as x goes to 0? What is the limit of 3x/x as x goes to 0? Think hard about those limits before you start on derivatives.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
903
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
4K