How to Calculate Moment of Inertia for Composite Objects?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the moment of inertia for composite objects, specifically a circle with a square inscribed in it or vice versa. Participants explore the relationships between the moments of inertia of these shapes and the implications of their areas and masses.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss subtracting the moment of inertia of the inner shape from that of the outer shape. Questions arise about the validity of this approach and the calculations involved in determining individual masses and moments of inertia.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the calculations involved, with some participants providing guidance on how to compute the moments of inertia separately. Uncertainty remains regarding the correct application of formulas and the assumptions about density and mass.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of considering the density of the materials and the areas of the shapes involved, as well as the potential inaccuracies in their explanations. The discussion reflects a mix of established formulas and personal interpretations of the problem.

Gmaximus
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
How would you find the moment of inertia of a circle with a square inscribed in it, or vice versa?

I thought about subtracting the inner object's I from the outer's, but that didn't seem to make sense.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Done properly, that would work. For example: The rotational inertia of a circle with a square cut out equals the rotational inertia of the circle minus the rotational inertia of the square.
 
My textbook's example seems to use the equation M=(4-Pi)DR^2, where D is density in the example with the circle cut out of a sqaure, but i don't follow. Wouldn't it just be:

[tex]Itotal=Isquare-Icircle[/tex]

But that leaves you with some problems... how do you find the indivual mass of each?
 
If the material is homogeneous, the density of the square cut out will equal that of the circle (its been quite a while since I did this, so forgive me if you find an inaccuracy in my explanation...do correct it though). You can compute the square and circle's moments of inertia separately and subtract using the idea you mentioned yourself and Doc Al's post. The individual mass can be calculated using the idea mentioned in the first line of this post.
 
But, the way i see it, the square has an area of 4r^2, and the circle has an area of pir^2
 
square minus circle

Gmaximus said:
But, the way i see it, the square has an area of 4r^2, and the circle has an area of pir^2
That would be the case for a square (of side 2r) with a circle (of radius r) cut out. In which case, [itex]I = I_{square} - I_{circle}[/itex].
 
With random numbers, (R=2 and M=2), i got: I=7.57
 
I don't believe that's right, because i kind of ad libbed a step where i used the relation i mentioned before. i'd show my work but its very long.



Here's how it worked:
M_s=Massofsqaure
[tex]I_s=1/6*M_S(2R)^2[/tex]
[tex]M_s=M+M_c[/tex]
[tex]M_c=(4-pi)R^2[/tex]


That last part I am unsure of.
 
Gmaximus said:
Here's how it worked:
M_s=Massofsqaure
[tex]I_s=1/6*M_S(2R)^2[/tex]
OK.
[tex]M_s=M+M_c[/tex]
Right, where M is the mass of the piece in question (square - circle).
[tex]M_c=(4-pi)R^2[/tex]
No. If I understand you properly, that should be [itex]M = (4 - \pi) D R^2[/itex], where D is density and R is the radius of the circle.

What mass are you actually given? And what about [itex]I_c[/itex]?
 
  • #10
I just forgot to add what i put for [tex]I_c[/tex]
It was:

I_c=1/2*M_c*R^2[/tex]

The example in the textbook derives it in a general form, with mass M, and Radius R, and a constant density. I Tried it with M=2 and R=2 And got the above number.
 
  • #11
Gmaximus said:
[tex]I_c=1/2*M_c*R^2[/tex]
Right.
The example in the textbook derives it in a general form, with mass M, and Radius R, and a constant density. I Tried it with M=2 and R=2 And got the above number.
Show your work so we can check it over.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
52
Views
5K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
4K