Vacuum Force Theory: Preliminary Report on Vacuum Force and Radii Relationship

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter elas
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Theory Vacuum
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion presents a preliminary report on the relationship between vacuum force and atomic radii, accessible on the newly added page titled "Vacuum and Radii" at http://elasticity2.tripod.com/. The report builds on previous findings regarding vacuum force (TFQHE) and bonding force in relation to mass. It emphasizes the need for updated information across all related pages and highlights the challenges of obtaining comprehensive atomic data, particularly from Emsley's table. The author aims to develop a new theory of Particle Physics, distinct from Quantum Physics, and encourages regular forum visits for ongoing updates.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vacuum force concepts, specifically TFQHE.
  • Familiarity with atomic structure and isotopes, particularly Cadmium.
  • Knowledge of the Standard Model of particle physics.
  • Basic web navigation skills to access the report and related pages.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of vacuum force in particle physics.
  • Explore Emsley's table for atomic data and its limitations.
  • Investigate the concept of anti-gravity in relation to current physics models.
  • Study the isotopes of Cadmium and their relevance to vacuum force models.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, researchers in particle physics, and anyone interested in alternative theories to the Standard Model, particularly those exploring vacuum force and atomic structure.

elas
I have added a new page to http://elasticity2.tripod.com/ titled Vacuum and Radii .Scroll down home page to title.
This contains a preliminary report on the relationship between vacuum force and radii.
Earlier pages showed how to find the vacuum force (TFQHE) and the relationship between bonding force and mass.
All pages will need amending to take into account the statements made on the 'Vacuum and Radii' page, but readers can now see the possibility of turning the Single Force concept into a new theory of Particle (i.e. not Quantum)Physics.
In future all progress reports will be made on this forum so interested readers should make regular monthly visits, progress takes time and reports at less than monthly intervals are unlikely.
I am still relying on Emsley's table for the bulk of my data on atoms. This as Emsley states, is not by any means the full data; so far all attempts to get at the source material have failed due to inaccessability or cost, any reference to accessable source data would be welcome.

Have replaced missing diagram

Added diagram of isotopes of Cadmium to show how structure changes are explained in a Vacuum Force Model. (and yes I have checked the diagram is there this time!).
The difficulties of working on this model can be realized when it is notice that of the 31 isotopes of cadmium details are only available for 11.
Figures given for the average radius vary from 149pm to 172pm. I have used the higher figure as this seems to fit in well with adjacent interpolations; but in the end it is not possible to do more than try to give an impression of atomic structure in a Vacuum Model; a decent standard of accuracy is not within reach without access to a higher standard of data. It is out there but is simply not accessable by an amateur.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
SILENCE IS THE SEVEREST FORM OF CRITICISM

and I took the complete lack of replies to this page as severe criticism. The only reason I have not closed down is that in Saturday's London Telegraph there was a report of another conference to try and decide whether the current impasse in the Standard Model should be resolved by the introduction of anti-gravity or vacuum.
As an ardent supporter of vacuum I resolved to have one more try (the last thing we need is yet another undefined entity). This time I am arranging my site in book form, comments please.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Revised page on Force now available
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
13K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
7K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K