Register to reply 
Let m be a natural number ... 
Share this thread: 
#1
Jul1610, 04:01 PM

P: 920

1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
Let m be a natural number. Find the flaw in the statement below. Explain why the statement is not valid, and change one symbol to correct it. "If T is a set of natural numbers such that 1) m [tex]\in[/tex] T and 2) n [tex]\in[/tex] T implies n+1 [tex]\in[/tex] T, then T = {n [tex]\in[/tex] N : n ≥ m} 2. Relevant equations Dunno. 3. The attempt at a solution Part 2) of the if statement tells us that T is an infinite set. I'm not sure exactly how 1) and 2) are connected. Hmmmm ... Help me get started. 


#2
Jul1610, 04:05 PM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 25,228

To get started think about this. Is m1 in T?



#3
Jul1610, 04:55 PM

P: 920

T is going to look something like {k, k+1, k+2, ...}, where k≥1 is an integer. That's basically what the second condition tells me. m is some element in T. That's all I know about m. Could m1 be in T? As long as m>k. 


#4
Jul1610, 05:01 PM

Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 4,500

Let m be a natural number ...
So is their equation for T correct?



#5
Jul1610, 05:11 PM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 25,228




Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Boundary of {1/n : n is a natural number}  Calculus & Beyond Homework  3  
Proof: Natural Number  Calculus & Beyond Homework  1  
Natural number  Precalculus Mathematics Homework  35  
Natural number  Engineering, Comp Sci, & Technology Homework  2  
NCk is a natural number  Linear & Abstract Algebra  18 