How does the rate of change in mass affect the motion of a system?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Prototype0
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Motion
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the effects of non-constant mass on the motion of a system, particularly focusing on the implications of mass change rates on force and acceleration. Participants explore theoretical frameworks, mathematical derivations, and conceptual clarifications related to motion in systems where mass is not constant.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the implications of a positive rate of change in mass (dm/dt) on acceleration and force, questioning the direction of acceleration when mass leaves the system.
  • Another participant seeks clarification on whether 'u' refers to the rate of mass entering/leaving the system or the velocity at which it does so, suggesting that if it is the latter, the force cannot be zero.
  • A different participant discusses the interpretation of (dm/dt)u as thrust force or momentum conservation effects, emphasizing that the system experiences acceleration due to mass leaving.
  • One participant challenges the initial derivation, arguing that if mass is lost at a velocity, an external force must be considered, rather than assuming a zero net force.
  • Another participant outlines two methods for deriving equations of motion with non-constant mass, emphasizing the role of thrust and Newton's third law in understanding the forces involved when mass changes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus, as there are multiple competing views regarding the interpretation of forces and the implications of mass change on motion. The discussion remains unresolved with differing opinions on the necessity of considering external forces and the nature of thrust.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of deriving equations for motion with non-constant mass, indicating that assumptions about thrust and external forces may vary based on the specific scenario being analyzed.

Prototype0
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm having trouble understanding motion with non-constant mass.
Specifically, if (dm/dt) is positive when the mass of the system is increased, I find that:
[tex]\vec{F} = \frac{dm}{dt}\vec{u} + \frac{d\vec{v}}{dt} m[/tex]
Where u is the velocity of the mass leaving/entering the system relative to the system and dm/dt is the rate of change in the mass of the system.

If I set F = 0, in a situation where there are no external forces, I get:
[tex]\frac{d\vec{v}}{dt}m = -\frac{dm}{dt}\vec{u}[/tex]

But if dm/dt is negative, doesn't this mean the acceleration due to mass leaving the system dv/dt is in the same direction as u, the velocity at which the mass is leaving the system?

Edit: Sorry for posting this in the wrong forum. I saw the warning, but I assumed it meant not posting specific homework questions, rather than general queries.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
when you say 'u' is the velocity of the mass leaving/entering the system, do you mean its the RATE that it enters/leaves or it is the velocity at which it leaves? If its the 'velocity' at which is leaves, then the force isn't 0.
 
It depends on your derivation. (dm/dt)u can be seen as the thrust force which is applied by the mass leaving the system on the system, or it can be seen as the effects of conservation of momentum, as mass leaves the system.

At any rate, F in this case signifies external forces, while (dm/dt)u signifies the effects of mass leaving the system. As you can see, the system is accelerated.

So, when I say u is the velocity, I do mean it's the velocity.
 
I don't quite follow, if you start from the top
[tex] F = \frac{d}{dt}m\vec{v} = m \frac{d\vec{v}}{dt} + \vec{v} \frac{dm}{dt}[/tex]
The first term is standard, and the second term is conservation of momentum, and simply results from the initial mass 'magically' growing or shrinking, it does not include any kind of thrust.

If you're losing mass non-magically, and instead its 'radiating' off at some velocity, then you have an external force in addition, no?
 
You can derive the equation for motion with non-constant mass using two ways. One of these ways involves the equations:
[tex]P(t)=m\vec{v}[/tex]
[tex]P(t+dt)=(m+dm)(\vec{v}+d\vec{v}) - dm(\vec{v}+\vec{u})[/tex]
[tex]P(t + dt) - P(t) = F*dt[/tex]

The other involves Newton's 2nd law:
[tex]\vec{F} = m\vec{a}[/tex]
Where m depends on time. Now, at time t the momentum of the leaving mass:
[tex]P(t)=0[/tex]
In respect to the system. However,
[tex]P(t+dt)=dm*\vec{u}[/tex]
Meaning, after some time dt the system grants some mass dm velocity u. As such:
[tex]\vec{P}(t+dt) - \vec{P}(t) = \vec{F}_{thrust}dt[/tex]
Which means:
[tex]dm*\vec{u} = \vec{F}_{thrust}dt[/tex]
[tex]\vec{F}_{thrust} = \frac{dm}{dt}\vec{u}[/tex]
Since the system applies this force on the mass, the mass must apply the same force, in the opposite direction on the system (Newton's third law). Thus:
[tex]\vec{F}_{other} - \vec{F}_{thrust} = m\vec{a}[/tex]
But in this case, we've chosen dm/dt to be the change in the mass 'leaving' the system, so we would have to switch the sign:
[tex]\vec{F}_{other} + \frac{dm}{dt}\vec{u} = m\vec{a}[/tex]

It doesn't matter what the thrust is caused by; it could be a guy kicking balls off a truck, or it could be pressurized gas. As you see, the mass does not 'magically' grow or shrink; there is a very real force which grants the leaving mass the velocity u. This is also true in conservation of momentum; we simply don't 'see' this force directly.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K