- #1
- 7,776
- 474
Retired Canadian physicist, Paul Marmet, has published a number of 'heretical' papers that question some fundamental principles of modern (non-Newtonian) physics. see: http://www.Newtonphysics.on.ca/
I have glanced through his paper that tries to explain errors in the math used in the Michelson Morley experiment.
http://www.Newtonphysics.on.ca/michelson/michelson.html
I am quite sure that it must be wrong simply because I feel sure the problem would have been identified long ago it there was one. This is not a very good reason, however, to dismiss his paper.
I'd like to know where Marmet is wrong. Does anyone know if Marmet's paper on the Michelson Morley 'mistake' has been reviewed/critiqued? If Marmet is right, I wonder how he explains E=mc^2.
Andrew Mason
I have glanced through his paper that tries to explain errors in the math used in the Michelson Morley experiment.
http://www.Newtonphysics.on.ca/michelson/michelson.html
I am quite sure that it must be wrong simply because I feel sure the problem would have been identified long ago it there was one. This is not a very good reason, however, to dismiss his paper.
I'd like to know where Marmet is wrong. Does anyone know if Marmet's paper on the Michelson Morley 'mistake' has been reviewed/critiqued? If Marmet is right, I wonder how he explains E=mc^2.
Andrew Mason
Last edited by a moderator: