What's the Time? Einstein & Moving Clocks Explained

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter zoobyshoe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Einstein's theory of relativity, specifically the phenomenon of time dilation experienced by two moving clocks. Participants express confusion over how each clock perceives the other as ticking slower, a concept rooted in the principles of special relativity. The original source of confusion stems from simplified explanations found in popular science literature, such as the New Illustrated Science and Invention Encyclopedia, which may lack the necessary context. A deeper understanding requires familiarity with the foundational concepts of relativity and the mathematics involved in calculating distances using reflected light.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein's theory of relativity
  • Familiarity with the concept of time dilation
  • Knowledge of the principles of light and signal transmission
  • Basic mathematical skills for calculating distances using reflected light
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Einstein's original papers on special relativity
  • Research the concept of simultaneity in relativity
  • Learn about the Lorentz transformation equations
  • Explore practical examples of time dilation in modern physics
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the complexities of Einstein's theory of relativity and its implications on time perception in moving systems.

zoobyshoe
Messages
6,514
Reaction score
1,255
I don't understand the thing
with Einstein and the moving
clocks. Two clocks moving re-
lative to each other; each
percieves the other to be keep-
ing slower time? Signals sent
back and forth arrive later than
expected?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes.


What is it you don't understand?
 
HallsofIvy,

Thanks for responding.

I recently looked this up in the
New Illustrated Science and Inve-
ntion Encyclopedia and was com-
pletely confused when I found what
has to have been an error on the
part of the writer and illustrator
of the article.

I went back to the original Einstein but found his discussion
to be dependent on the preceeding
chapters.

My sense is that it can probably
be explained independantly of
the whole theory, as the Encyclo-
pedia tried to do, but only by
someone who actually understands
it.

I'll start off by saying that I
understand the concept and formula
for calculating distance by
reflected light.

Thanks
-Zoob
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
7K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
6K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 88 ·
3
Replies
88
Views
8K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K