Flash MX vs. 2004: Comparing Features and User Experience

  • Thread starter Thread starter amwbonfire
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flash
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around comparing Flash MX and Flash MX 2004, focusing on the features and user experience of both versions. Participants share their opinions on whether upgrading is worthwhile, considering aspects such as cost and new functionalities.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the value of upgrading from Flash MX to Flash MX 2004, expressing interest in user experiences with both versions.
  • Another participant suggests trying out Flash MX 2004, hinting at alternative ways to access it without directly sharing links.
  • Some participants note that the differences between the two versions are minimal, mentioning upgrades to ActionScript and interface changes as the main updates.
  • A participant indicates that financial constraints influence their decision, suggesting they may wait for a future version if the current upgrade does not offer significant improvements.
  • There is a suggestion to try the demo version of Flash MX 2004, although one participant expresses concerns about the size of the download.
  • Overall, there is a sentiment that the upgrade may not be worth it at this time, based on the feedback received.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express mixed views on the necessity of upgrading, with some suggesting it may not be worth the cost while others encourage trying the demo. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the overall value of the upgrade.

Contextual Notes

Participants' opinions are influenced by personal financial situations and the perceived significance of the updates between the two versions. There is no consensus on the overall benefits of upgrading.

amwbonfire
Does anyone have Flash MX 2004? I've got Flash MX, and I'm wondering whether it's worth upgrading or not. Looking at the "what's new" lists, I've found a few things I'd like to have. However, I'd prefer to get some opinions from anyone who's used both versions, or just has MX 2004.

Thanks! :smile:

Andy
AMW Bonfire
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
Well you could always try it out
there are some good sites for that although i fear posting them could get me in trouble
contact me and I will tell you how
I have mx 2004
 
If your tight on money it's not a huge difference. They upgraded actionscript and update the interface a bit but that's it.
 
I am pretty tight on money. If there's not many new updates, I'll wait until I get some more money, or until the next Flash comes out.

And Tom, thanks, but no thanks. If I tried out flash mx 2004, it'd only be the demo. Thanks anyway.

Andy
AMW Bonfire
 
well... why don't u try the demo if your not into cracking
 
It's far too big to download. I was just looking for some opinions on the differences between the two. It seems, as I suspected, the upgrade probably isn't worth it at the moment.

Thanks for your help! :-p
 

Similar threads

Other Relearning Math: Comparing Resources for the Best Learning Experience
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
13K
Misc. Warming Barrels of Honey With Light
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
What Are Good Alternatives for PTC Thermistors with Sharp Resistance Changes?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Mathematica Using Mathematica vs pen and paper in Physics
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Engineering Physics vs Applied Physics vs Engineering
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K
Useful ipad apps for physics majors?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
EQualityCoin- What type of model is this?
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
April Fool's Physics Papers 2026
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Dual Honours CS/Maths vs Engineering
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Coursera signature track: worth $50?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K