Probability Density in Quantum Mechanics

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the probability density associated with a wave function for a free particle in one dimension within the context of quantum mechanics. Participants are exploring the concepts of wave functions, probability densities, and normalization.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to construct the probability density from the wave function and are questioning the limits of integration for normalization. There is confusion regarding the nature of the probability density as a function versus a numerical value. Some participants are exploring the implications of the wave function being complex and the effects of normalization when considering different spatial constraints.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants expressing confusion about normalization and the characteristics of the probability density. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relationship between the wave function and its amplitude, as well as the implications of the particle being contained within a specific region.

Contextual Notes

There are ongoing questions about the assumptions related to the wave function's normalization, particularly in the context of infinite versus finite regions. Participants are also considering the implications of a constant probability density and its graphical representation.

JamesJames
Messages
204
Reaction score
0
Consider the wave function corresponding to a free particle in one dimension. Construct the probability density and graph it as a function of position. Is this wavefunction normalizable?

Now, I think that the function should be Psi = C1*exp(ikx-iEt). Thus, the probability density should be the integral over x of C1^2. What I am confused about is what are the limits of the integration...0 and inifinity? And also won' t the answer come out to be a constant if the upper limit is not infinity ? I am totally lost on the normalizable issue. :confused:

Thanks,
james
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
A probability density is NOT an integral- it is the density function itself which is what you give. The probability density is not a number, it is a function.
 
So, it should then be
[C1*exp(ikx-iEt)][C1*exp(-ikx+iEt)] which equals C1^2. I don' t see how you can get a function and what about the normalization question?

Any help would be great
 
Note, your C1 may be complex.

With regard to normalization, if you KNOW your particle is absolutely contained in some region then [itex]\left| C1\right|^2 = \frac {1}{L}[/itex] where L is the size (length) of the region. Ask yourself what happens when L tends toward infinity.
 
I am still confused about the normalization...does it have to be of length L? Also the probability density would then produce a straight line rather than some curve which seems unusual to me.
 
Normalization means that you want to find the amplitude of the wave function and you do that by requiring the probability of finding the particle anywhere to be 1. If you KNOW it's in a box then the size of the box will be part of the normalization.
 

Similar threads

Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K