| Thread Closed |
Help me think about Proton-Proton -> Proton+Antiproton collision! |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Sep5-10, 09:14 AM | #1 |
|
|
Help me think about Proton-Proton -> Proton+Antiproton collision!
Hi, just registered to Physics Forums after doing a lot of lurking...
Anyway, the semester is restarting and my brain is rusty. Please help! Here is my question: I am asked to show that a proton colliding with a proton at rest must have energy greater than 5.6 GeV in order to produce a proton antiproton pair, and to do this using relativistic energy/momentum conservation. Here is where I am at in my thinking.. Please let me know if I am making this too hard for myself, or if I am missing some big obvious detail! 1. In order to produce the proton-antiproton pair, the moving proton must overcome the coulomb barrier of the 'at rest' proton. (This seems trivial.. and I don't think I should include any math to take this into account). 2. Since it is suggested 5.6 GeV is the minimum energy, both proton and antiproton will be at rest after the collision. So now I wonder where to go. I know the equations E = K + m_p (setting c=1) E = sqrt(p^2 + m_p^2) I take it they both have m_p = 938 MeV (rest energy). I am confused.. After the collision, the proton-antiproton will have a total energy of 2*938 MeV. Where does that 5.6 GeV go to? |
| Sep5-10, 09:36 AM | #2 |
|
Mentor
|
What frame do you want to work the problem in?
|
| Sep5-10, 09:42 AM | #3 |
|
|
I would start in the lab frame.
|
| Sep5-10, 10:41 AM | #4 |
|
|
Help me think about Proton-Proton -> Proton+Antiproton collision!
I solved the problem! (Thanks to physicsforums) For reference, see this comment:
http://www.physicsforums.com/showthr...oton+collision Thanks to you all! Guess next time I will search a little harder before posting.. Sorry for the inconvenience! |
| Sep5-10, 12:01 PM | #5 |
|
Mentor
|
|
| Sep5-10, 12:05 PM | #6 |
|
|
Is the flaw of using the lab frame that we aren't seeing the system from the particle's viewpoint?
In such a case, that would mean that using the lab frame in this case would only work as we specify that one of the particles is at rest (and thus its frame coincides with the lab frame)? Thanks! |
| Thread Closed |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Help me think about Proton-Proton -> Proton+Antiproton collision!
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Collision of a moving proton into a proton at rest (relativity) | Introductory Physics Homework | 13 | ||
| B meson from proton antiproton collision | High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics | 6 | ||
| Why LHC use proton-proton collide instead of proton-antiproton collide? | High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics | 13 | ||
| relativity - proton-proton collision | Advanced Physics Homework | 2 | ||
| Proton-Antiproton collision | High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics | 2 | ||