Cauchy Mean Value Theorem Proof for Continuous and Integrable Functions

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the Cauchy Mean Value Theorem for continuous and integrable functions, specifically focusing on the conditions under which the theorem holds and the implications of those conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the definitions and conditions necessary for the theorem, with some questioning the relevance of existing literature and whether the original poster has access to sufficient resources. Others suggest using related theorems to approach the proof.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing references and suggestions for further exploration. There is a mix of helpful guidance and some critical commentary on the nature of the problem posed.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the potential confusion between different versions of the Mean Value Theorem and emphasize the need for clarity in understanding the specific theorem being discussed.

iceman
Hi, I really need some help in sovling this proof!

Prove the Cauchy Mean Value Theorem:
If f,g : [a,b]->R satisfy f continuous, g integrable and
g(x)>=0 for all x then there exists element c is a member of set [a,b] so that
int(x=b,a)f(x)g(x)dx=f(c)int(x=b,a)g(x)dx.

Thanks for your help :D
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi iceman,
imagine I'm a complete ignorant in mathematics. Then I can still type your key words into google, and get for instance this:

http://www.maths.abdn.ac.uk/~igc/tch/ma2001/notes/node42.html



Edit:
Sorry, couldn't help it. But if I was you, I'd ask my prof what's the good in posing problems the answer to which is in the literature. Can't he come up with something more creative?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Arcnets: You also have to be able to UNDERSTAND the results of a google search.
The "Cauchy Mean Value Theorem" your reference gives is clearly NOT the same as the "Cauchy Mean Value Theorem" in the original post. For one thing, the Cauchy Mean Value Theorem the OP asked about is an integral mean value theorem.

(I would use the phrase "extended mean value theorem" for the result given in Arcnet's link.)

Iceman: You can, however, USE the (extended) mean value theorem.

Let F(x)= int(t=a to x) f(t)g(t)dt and let G(x)= int(t= a to x)g(t)dt. Use those in the extended mean value theorem:

(F(b)- F(a))/(G(b)- G(a))= F'(c)/G'(c) for some c in [a,b].

That's not the complete answer- you will still need to do some work.
 
OK,OK. Back to being helpful not provocative.
 
Oh, darn! Provocative is so MUCH more fun!

(And yes, I have complained about doing peoples "google" work for them myself.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K