Constant Acc with two particles

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the necessary constant deceleration for a high-speed train traveling at 44.72 m/s to avoid colliding with a sidecar moving at 8.056 m/s, located 676 meters ahead. The correct approach involves determining the relative velocity, which is 36.664 m/s, and applying the kinematic equation v = u + at. By solving for acceleration with the known values, the required deceleration is established as -0.775 m/s², ensuring the train stops just before the sidecar.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinematic equations
  • Knowledge of relative velocity concepts
  • Ability to solve quadratic equations
  • Familiarity with motion analysis in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of kinematic equations in collision avoidance scenarios
  • Learn about relative velocity and its implications in motion analysis
  • Explore advanced topics in dynamics, including acceleration and deceleration calculations
  • Investigate real-world applications of motion equations in transportation safety
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, engineers, and professionals involved in transportation safety and motion analysis will benefit from this discussion.

pappaloo
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Im having a problem with this question, which is probably rather simple but I am making a lot harder than it needs to be.

A high-speed train is traveling at 44.72m/s and it sees a sidecar a distance of 676m ahead. The sidecar is traveling with a constant velocity or 8.056m/s.

The question asks what the magnitude of the resulting constant deceleration must be if a collision is to be just avoided.

I took two of the derived C.A. equations and in each one had two unknowns which were x(final) and t.

I then equated the two equations and solved the linear system for t at which I arrived with an answer of 47.26s

From there it is quite easy to figure out the rest of the question, but I am not sure if I am doing this question the best way or even correctly for that matter.

Any suggestions or comments would be greatly appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure exactly what you did, but here are two ways to approach it:
(1) Write the postions of each (sidecar and train) as a function of time. Set them equal, and solve for t. (This is what you tried, I believe.) Of course, the acceleration is a variable. Since the equation is a quadratic, you can find a constraint that will tell you the minimum acceleration that just avoids the collision.
(2) Look at the motion from the frame of the sidecar and solve it directly with a kinematic equation.

And welcome to PF!
 
.

It seems like you are on the right track with your approach to this problem. You have correctly identified the two unknowns (x(final) and t) and used two equations to solve for them. However, there is a simpler way to approach this problem using the concept of relative velocity.

First, we can calculate the relative velocity between the train and the sidecar. This can be done by subtracting the sidecar's velocity from the train's velocity, since they are moving in the same direction. This gives us a relative velocity of 36.664m/s.

Next, we can use the formula v = u + at, where v is the final velocity, u is the initial velocity, a is the acceleration, and t is the time. We know the initial velocity (36.664m/s) and the final velocity (0m/s, since we want the train to come to a stop just before colliding with the sidecar). We also know the distance between the train and the sidecar (676m). Plugging these values into the formula, we get:

0 = 36.664 + a(47.26)

Solving for a, we get a deceleration of -0.775m/s^2. This means that the train needs to decelerate at a rate of 0.775m/s^2 in order to avoid a collision with the sidecar.

In summary, your approach was correct, but using the concept of relative velocity can simplify the problem and give you a quicker solution. Keep up the good work!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K