How do nonclassical observations influence eventual classical outcomes?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Loren Booda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Classical
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the influence of quantum measurements on macroscopic outcomes, questioning whether the effects of quantum observations can persist or if they are ultimately averaged out in accordance with the correspondence principle. The scope includes theoretical implications and conceptual understanding of quantum mechanics and classical physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that quantum measurements can influence macroscopic possibilities, suggesting that the effects may not always average out.
  • Others argue that experiments demonstrating "quantum weirdness" indicate that quantum effects can lead to observable macroscopic phenomena.
  • A participant references "Schroedinger's cat" as an example of how quantum measurements might impact macroscopic systems.
  • One participant expresses gratitude for the reminder of these concepts, indicating a personal reflection rather than a technical contribution.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit differing views on whether quantum measurements have lasting effects on macroscopic outcomes, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain without consensus.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not resolve the assumptions regarding the nature of quantum measurements and their implications for classical outcomes, leaving open questions about the conditions under which quantum effects manifest in macroscopic systems.

Loren Booda
Messages
3,115
Reaction score
4
Can the choices of quantum measurement ever affect subsequent macroscopic possibilities, or do their statistics always average out overall, a la the correspondence principle?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is possible to arrange experiments so that the averaging does not wash out the effects. After all, all the "quantum weirdness" experiments show macroscopic effects (bands on a screen or whatever) from quantum causes.
 
That was the whole point of "Schroedinger's cat" wasn't it- that quantum measurements can affect macro systems?
 
Thanks, folks, I just needed to be reminded.
 

Similar threads

Graduate Exact symmetry, quantum states, and symmetric dynamics
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Undergrad Do ensemble-based predictions truly describe real finite systems?
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Graduate Multi-scale Decoherence and the Quantum-to-Classical Transition
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Graduate Can local conservation be verified experimentally?
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Graduate Is quantum theory a microscopic theory?
  • · Replies 232 ·
8
Replies
232
Views
23K
Graduate Number of particles in canonical ensemble
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Graduate Do entanglement networks encode a unique, local historical record?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Graduate Macroscopic systems in the quantum theory book by Asher Peres
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Undergrad Does action at a distance violate any conservation principles?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
High School Quantum entanglement and hidden variables
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K