| New Reply |
Tube lemma generalization proof |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Oct24-10, 03:48 PM | #1 |
|
Recognitions:
|
Tube lemma generalization proof
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
Let A and B be compact subspaces of X and Y, respectively. Let N be an open set in X x Y containing A x B. One needs to show that there exist open sets U in X and V in Y such that A x B [itex]\subseteq[/itex] U x V [itex]\subseteq[/itex] N. 3. The attempt at a solution Here's my try: First of all, since N is open, it can be written as a union of basis elements in X x Y, i.e. let N = [itex]\cup U_{i} \times V_{i}[/itex]. Then we cover A x B with basis elements contained in N, so that [itex]A \times B \subseteq \cup U_{i}' \times V_{i}'[/itex]. Since A and B are compact, so is A x B, and for this cover, we have a finite subcover, so that [itex]A \times B \subseteq \cup_{i=1}^n U_{i}' \times V_{i}'[/itex]. Now we have the following relation: [itex]A \times B \subseteq \cup_{i=1}^n U_{i}' \times V_{i}' \subseteq \cup U_{i} \times V_{i} = N[/itex]. Now, I'm not sure if this relation holds: [tex]\cup_{i=1}^n (U_{i}' \times V_{i}') \cap (\cup U_{i} \times V_{i}) \subseteq \cup_{i=1}^n (U_{i}' \cap (\cup U_{i})) \times \cup_{i=1}^n (V_{i}' \cap (\cup V_{i})) \subseteq N[/tex]. If it does, then [tex]U = \cup_{i=1}^n (U_{i}' \cap (\cup U_{i}))[/tex] and [tex]V = \cup_{i=1}^n (V_{i}' \cap (\cup V_{i}))[/tex] are the sets we were looking for. |
| Oct25-10, 01:51 AM | #2 |
|
Recognitions:
|
If x = (a, b) is in [tex](\cup_{i=1}^n (U_{i}' \times V_{i}')) \cap (\cup U_{i} \times V_{i})[/tex] then a is in Ui, b is in Vi, for some i, and a is in Ui' and b is in Vi'. So, a is in the intersection of Ui and Ui', for some i, and b is in the intersection of Vi and Vi', for some i, i.e. in their unions, so a is in [tex](\cup_{i=1}^n (U_{i}' \cap (\cup U_{i}))) \times (\cup_{i=1}^n (V_{i}' \cap (\cup V_{i})))[/tex].
Any comments? Edit: just corrected some LaTeX errors and added some brackets, now it should be OK. |
| Oct27-10, 12:53 AM | #3 |
|
Recognitions:
|
Still no ideas? I'd like to know if this is correct, so I can finalize the exercise section I'm working on.
|
| New Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Tube lemma generalization proof
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Hensel's lemma (Understanding it's Proof) | Linear & Abstract Algebra | 2 | ||
| Schwarz's lemma, complex analysis proof | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 1 | ||
| Proof of a result inside a lemma? | General Math | 9 | ||
| Fixed-Tube-Sheet Shell and tube Heat Exchanger | Materials & Chemical Engineering | 1 | ||
| urgent!! i need the proof of squeeze lemma on sequences | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 5 | ||