What is the volume of an iron atom?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hytuoc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atom Iron Volume
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the volume of an iron atom and the distance between the centers of adjacent atoms, based on given mass and density values. The subject area includes atomic structure and properties of materials.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the volume calculation of an iron atom and the subsequent distance between atoms. There are attempts to verify the correctness of the book's answer and to clarify the calculations involved.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the calculations, while others question the accuracy of the book's answer. Multiple interpretations of the results are being explored, and there is a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the calculations presented.

Contextual Notes

There are discrepancies noted between participants' calculations and the book's answers, leading to discussions about potential errors in the original problem setup or assumptions made during calculations.

hytuoc
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Plz help ASAP!

Iron has a mass of 7.87g/cm^3 of volume, and the mass of an iron atom is 9.27x10^(-26)kg. If the atoms are spherical and tightly packed,
a) a) what is the volume of an iron atom? --> this one I do know how to do it, the answer is 1.18x10^29 m^3
b) what is the distance between the centers of adjacent atoms?
This one, my answer is different than the answer in the book
This was how I did it:
b) [(1.18 x 10^29 m^3) x 3/4] / pi = r^3
r= 3.04 x 10^9 m
=> the distance between the centers of adjacen atoms is 6.08 x 10^9 meters
****but the answer of the book is 0.282 nm
Would someone please show me how to do part b of the problem? Thanks so much
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks good to me... Are you sure the book contains the right answer?
 
For a), I assume you meant [itex]1.18\times10^{-29}[/itex]. All of the other exponents should also be negative, I believe.

I get [itex]6.05\times10^{-10}[/itex] m for b. I think there's an error in the book. You used the right method.
 
got it!

I figured it out!
Sirus was right, the radius is 1.18X10^-29. The you jst multiply that by 3/4pi and then take the third root. Finally, you multiply it by 2 and get 2.82X10^-10, which is 282nm.
 
Right, I was putting pi in the numerator in my calculator (hytuoc, I suspect this was also your error). Book was right.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
8K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K