Who Won the First Presidential Debate: Kerry or Bush?

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter GENIERE
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on opinions regarding the first presidential debate between John Kerry and George W. Bush. Participants analyze the candidates' performances, their potential impact on polling, and the implications for the election. The conversation includes elements of debate analysis, polling data interpretation, and speculation about voter behavior.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants believe Kerry performed better due to his articulate presentation and steady position, while others note that he strayed off topic.
  • There is a suggestion that Kerry may gain a few points in the polls, which some argue would be sufficient for him to remain competitive.
  • Polling data is referenced, with one participant citing a Gallup poll indicating 53% of respondents thought Kerry won, while another mentions an online poll showing 70% in favor of Kerry.
  • Concerns are raised about Kerry's commitment to his clarified positions, with some participants arguing that he cannot afford further flip-flops.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the implications of polling data, citing potential biases in the samples used.
  • There are differing opinions on Bush's performance, with some suggesting he appeared to lose momentum during the debate.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on who won the debate, with multiple competing views on the candidates' performances and the potential impact on the election. There is also disagreement regarding the reliability of polling data.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference historical polling biases and discuss the implications of specific statements made during the debate, indicating a nuanced understanding of the electoral context.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in political debate analysis, polling trends, and electoral strategies may find this discussion relevant.

GENIERE
I’d probably give the edge to Kerry. He’s finally decided on a steady position for the last week or so and maintained it in the debate and admitted to making an error in his “voted for voted against...” statement.

The edge goes to Kerry because he is more articulate and managed not to appear pompous. Kerry did wander off topic and inject other issues, against the rules, while Bush did not. I don’t think the average person would notice. Otherwise both were on message.

Although I give the edge to Kerry, I don’t think he can expect more than a few (3) points gain in the polls.

He probably did well enough to ward off most of the criticism from his own party.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
GENIERE said:
Although I give the edge to Kerry, I don’t think he can expect more than a few (3) points gain in the polls.

That would be all he needs, according to the most recent polls, and ignoring Gallup, which seems to have a statisticaly biased sample problem (reminiscent of the old Literary Digest poll which gave the 1936 election to Landon. They used telephone polls, and in that depression year, many more repubs than dems had phones).
 
I just hope Kerry continues to this well. If he does, and if undecided voters are paying attention, he'll win for sure.

Isn't it great when you have such a close election? Man, I bet debating who would win the 1980 and '84 election would have been boring. Has anyone seen electoral results for those years?Yeesh!

Oh and this JUST in:

Gallop phone poll of about 600 registered voters show that 53% of people think Kerry did a better job and 47% say Bush.
Don't know what that'll mean, but yeah...
 
My opinion ends up going the wrong way, so I'll shut up.

Here are some other people's opinions :

Joe Scarborough just said that Bush looked like he kinda lost steam half-way through (like he had 30 minutes of material for a 90 minute debate).

Supposedly, Ralph Reed was looking miserable just after the debate...so that's probably a more relevant and telling opinion.

But for the people that trade on the Iowa Electronic Market, Kerry's stock dropped by 8 times as much as Bush's...so that's the flip-side.

A bunch of "analysts" are saying that Kerry seems to have come out as an anti-war candidate...and how does an anti-war President win a war ?

An online poll here : http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036789/ with about 500,000 votes now for "who won the debate" has a whopping 70% voting for Kerry.
 
Last edited:
Where did you get the 500,000 number from?
 
OK lefties don’t get too excited. In “clarifying” his position, Kerry is now committed to it. Obviously he can’t afford another flip-flop. He provided several easily attacked statements. The “global permission” comment, (can’t recall actual statement) will certainly haunt him as well as the N. Korea position.

While Kerry managed to become competitive, he still has an uphill battle. Bush didn’t deliver the knockout punch I hoped he would.
 
Dissident Dan said:
Where did you get the 500,000 number from?

It's written in gray next to an asterisk. Now the number is 611,425 votes.
 
GENIERE said:
OK lefties don’t get too excited. In “clarifying” his position, Kerry is now committed to it. Obviously he can’t afford another flip-flop. He provided several easily attacked statements. The “global permission” comment, (can’t recall actual statement) will certainly haunt him as well as the N. Korea position.

While Kerry managed to become competitive, he still has an uphill battle. Bush didn’t deliver the knockout punch I hoped he would.

Yes, this may be tough for him, and I've no doubt whatsoever, that we'll soon be seeing ads talking targeting the "global test" (not "global permission", there's a difference) quote.
 
selfAdjoint said:
That would be all he needs, according to the most recent polls, and ignoring Gallup, which seems to have a statisticaly biased sample problem (reminiscent of the old Literary Digest poll which gave the 1936 election to Landon. They used telephone polls, and in that depression year, many more repubs than dems had phones).
Gallup's explanation of that makes sense to me.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 114 ·
4
Replies
114
Views
12K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
22
Views
4K