What are the range of values of k for the equation (k+1)x^2+4kx+9=0?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Gughanath
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the range of values of k for the quadratic equation (k+1)x² + 4kx + 9 = 0 that results in no real roots. Participants explore the implications of the discriminant and the conditions required for the equation to remain quadratic.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest using the quadratic formula and the concept of the discriminant to find conditions on k for no real roots.
  • Others express confusion about applying the quadratic formula and the discriminant, indicating a need for clarification on these concepts.
  • A participant identifies the discriminant as 16k² - 36k - 36 and discusses the need for it to be less than zero.
  • There are mentions of finding the zeros of the discriminant to establish the range of k-values.
  • Some participants engage in factoring the discriminant and discuss the implications of the resulting inequalities.
  • One participant humorously acknowledges their confusion and seeks further assistance in understanding the problem.
  • Another participant corrects a previous statement about the roots of the discriminant and provides the correct factors.
  • There are light-hearted exchanges among participants, indicating a collaborative and supportive atmosphere.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the approach of using the discriminant to find the range of k-values, but there are varying levels of understanding and some confusion regarding the application of these concepts. The discussion remains unresolved as participants continue to seek clarity and assistance.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the steps involved in using the discriminant and factoring the resulting equations, indicating potential gaps in understanding the mathematical processes required.

Who May Find This Useful

Students or individuals seeking to understand quadratic equations, the discriminant, and conditions for real roots in mathematical contexts may find this discussion beneficial.

Gughanath
Messages
118
Reaction score
0
what are the range of values of k that gives the equation (k+1)x^2+4kx+9=0 ...I work it out :confused: ...please help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!
I think you have omitted something from your text; what was that?
 
ups sorry...it should say at the end...that gives the equation no real roots
 
And what do you think that means?
 
Hi, you can use the quadratic formula to find the roots of your equation. Forcing no real roots is equivalent to forcing the discriminant (the part under the root sign) to be negative. This will give you conditions on k that you're looking for.

ps. you have to make a restriction on k to guarantee that your equation is a quadratic and not linear. what is this restriction?
 
i can't use the quadrativ formula for this euqation..when i work out the bracket i get
x^2+x^2k+4kx+9=0 ...i have no idea how to use the discrimant in this case..please help
 
Let a=k+1, b=4k, c=9.
Then your equation looks like
ax^2+bx+c=0
Can you solve that one?
 
i know that the discrimiant has to be smaller than 0...
 
And what is the discriminant, expressed with a,b and c?
 
  • #10
no i am still confused
 
  • #11
What is your problem?
 
  • #12
could you please just show me how i work out this questions?
 
  • #13
because then i will undertand
 
  • #14
I ask you again:
Given the equation:
ax^2+bx+c=0
What is the discriminant?
 
  • #15
16k^2-(4[k+1]*9)<0 that becomes 16k^2-36k-36<0
 
  • #16
Gughanath said:
16k^2-(4[k+1]*9)<0 that becomes 16k^2-36k-36<0

Good, now can you find the values of k that satisfy this new inequality?
 
  • #17
Very good!
Here's a hint:
In order to find the range of k-values your after,
1. find the zeros in your discriminant.
That is, solve the equation for k:
[tex]16k^{2}-36k-36=0[/tex]
2. You weren't interested in the k-values for which the discriminant was zero, but the k-values for which the discriminant is less than zero.
But you should figure out for yourself that those values must lie between the two values found in 1.
 
  • #18
i see that i have to factoris ethe equation in the disriminant now..but i can't find the right numbers
 
  • #19
Gughanath said:
i see that i have to factoris ethe equation in the disriminant now..but i can't find the right numbers
Quite true!
Look at my previous post for hints.
 
  • #20
please...i have no idea how to continue...
 
  • #21
Well, what values of k solves:
[tex]16k^{2}-36k-36=0[/tex] ?

(Note: You were asked to find the values of k so that the discriminant is less than zero, not zero, but finding the zeroes is a good start)
 
  • #22
k..thanks for your help...
 
  • #23
Now, having found the k-values yielding zero discriminant, you should be able to write the discrimanant as:
[tex]16k^{2}-36k-36=16(k-3)(k+\frac{3}{4})[/tex]
What must then the k-interval be which yields negative discriminant?
 
  • #24
how did u factorise that?
 
  • #25
It is the roots of equation gained by setting the discriminant equal to 0 (that is, -3/4 and 3 are the roots)
 
  • #26
ooo (: I am so...now i undertand it...the discriminant is 16k^2+36k-36..simplified it becomes 16[k^2 - (9/4)k - 9/4]...-3 and +3/4 multiplied give -9/4 and when added they also give -9/4...so these are these are the roots..factorised the equation becomes 16[(k-3)(k+3/4)]=0..the values of k here is 3 or -3/4...but the equation must be lower than 0 for 16[(k-3)(k+3/4)]<0 the range of the values of k are in -3/4<k<3...is that right?
 
  • #27
thanks a lot for your help everyone...sorry for bothering you..i was so busy yesterday my brain wasant running properly...lol
 
  • #28
You're right about the interval;I wouldn't agree to what you said about your brain, though..
 
  • #29
very good so any k that satisfies 16k^2-36k-36<0 is the k we are looking for ..
lets divide throughout by 4 to make the eqn simple
we get 4k^2-9k-9<0
i can write this as,
(4k+1)(k-3)<0

what does this imply?
(Note : if x*y < 0 it means multiplication of x and y must be negative)

-- AI
 
  • #30
damn ! i did not realize this thread had 2 pages!
umm please delete my current and last post as they are totally irrelevant now!

-- AI
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K