Active heart rate wrist monitor technology- Without using a chest strap


by taylaron
Tags: active, chest, heart, monitor, rate, strap, technology, wrist
taylaron
taylaron is offline
#1
Jan24-11, 01:19 PM
PF Gold
taylaron's Avatar
P: 381
Greetings.
I've been looking for commercial products that are capable of actively sensing the user's heart pulse rate while attached to their wrist. No additional chest strap monitor, etc... included.

Unlike all wrist-located heart monitors i've found online, i'm looking for one that can actively sense the user's pulse through direct contact with the wrist, opposed to pressing your finger against an on board sensor.

Does anybody know of existing commercial technology allowing wrist-based active heart monitors?

Regards,
-Taylaron
Phys.Org News Partner Medical research news on Phys.org
Chronic inflammation linked to 'high-grade' prostate cancer
Impact of childhood bullying still evident after 40 years
Is UK shale gas extraction posing a risk to public health?
taylaron
taylaron is offline
#2
Jan24-11, 01:35 PM
PF Gold
taylaron's Avatar
P: 381
Why cant a Fetal heart rate monitor, which senses changes in frequency and amplitude after transmitting ultrasonic pulses be used in a heat monitoring wrist watch?

I found a good description of a FHR here: http://www.buzzle.com/articles/what-...s-it-work.html
bPositive
bPositive is offline
#3
Jan24-11, 04:31 PM
P: 1
Check the Mio watch.

www.miowatch.com

It uses electrical sensors to measure your ECG signal.

taylaron
taylaron is offline
#4
Jan24-11, 07:37 PM
PF Gold
taylaron's Avatar
P: 381

Active heart rate wrist monitor technology- Without using a chest strap


Perfect! Thank you very much bPositive
Borek
Borek is offline
#5
Jan25-11, 02:17 AM
Admin
Borek's Avatar
P: 22,666
Google for cardio training heart rate monitor. Plenty of models, Mio included.

You can't easily direct ultrasonic pulses from the wrist to the heart.
taylaron
taylaron is offline
#6
Jan26-11, 12:02 PM
PF Gold
taylaron's Avatar
P: 381
Quote Quote by Borek View Post
You can't easily direct ultrasonic pulses from the wrist to the heart.
I agree that transmission from the wrist to the heart is impractical for this purpose. But i'm not focusing on getting the pulse directly from the heart. I was more focused on (hah, literally..) using the wrist's cross section profile. I would like to send pulses from one side of your wrist to the other side. The wrist-band's transducer would send waves that pass through the larger blood veins located directly above the wrist's bottom sensor. Fluctuations in blood pressure from the heart beats and the subsequent flow in the surrounding tissue would, I presume, be observed in the traveling waves through the wrist.

-Tay
jeanlucl
jeanlucl is offline
#7
Jun24-11, 10:32 AM
P: 1
Quote Quote by taylaron View Post
Greetings.
I've been looking for commercial products that are capable of actively sensing the user's heart pulse rate while attached to their wrist. No additional chest strap monitor, etc... included.

Unlike all wrist-located heart monitors i've found online, i'm looking for one that can actively sense the user's pulse through direct contact with the wrist, opposed to pressing your finger against an on board sensor.

Does anybody know of existing commercial technology allowing wrist-based active heart monitors?

Regards,
-Taylaron

Look at: http://www.smarthealthusa.com/about.asp.
Jean Luc
taylaron
taylaron is offline
#8
Jun24-11, 10:59 AM
PF Gold
taylaron's Avatar
P: 381
Quote Quote by jeanlucl View Post
Thanks Jean!
Evo
Evo is offline
#9
Jun24-11, 11:06 AM
Mentor
Evo's Avatar
P: 25,925
Pulse monitors on the wrist are not as good as those that have chest straps, why would you want one?

http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/v...1/13455879001/
taylaron
taylaron is offline
#10
Jun25-11, 01:00 PM
PF Gold
taylaron's Avatar
P: 381
Quote Quote by Evo View Post
Pulse monitors on the wrist are not as good as those that have chest straps, why would you want one?

http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/v...1/13455879001/
I want to use the wrist-bound heart rate monitor to easily and conveniently measure a user's heart rate while data is sent to a computer via a USB cable. The computer analyzes the pulse rate and when the pulse rate drops below a set (adjustable) BPM the computer initiates a sequence that tells the computer program when the user is asleep.

I don't want a chest-strap because it's far too cumbersome... I also don't want to use a fingernail-type sensor because the user will be using their hands to complete a task.

-Tay
Evo
Evo is offline
#11
Jun25-11, 01:07 PM
Mentor
Evo's Avatar
P: 25,925
Quote Quote by taylaron View Post
I want to use the wrist-bound heart rate monitor to easily and conveniently measure a user's heart rate while data is sent to a computer via a USB cable. The computer analyzes the pulse rate and when the pulse rate drops below a set (adjustable) BPM the computer initiates a sequence that tells the computer program when the user is asleep.

I don't want a chest-strap because it's far too cumbersome... I also don't want to use a fingernail-type sensor because the user will be using their hands to complete a task.

-Tay
So the person is tethered to a computer with a USB cord? I would think pulse rate would not be a very good indicator of sleep.
taylaron
taylaron is offline
#12
Jun26-11, 12:18 AM
PF Gold
taylaron's Avatar
P: 381
I agree with you Evo, but i'm having difficulty finding another suitable solution.
Specifically*, I need to be able to quickly and easily detect whither or not a person is about to fall asleep. For instance, i'm at work on my computer and its the middle of the night and i'm about to fall asleep at my desk. I want the computer to wake me up again as soon as it knows i'm about to fall asleep. That is the challenge.

I need contact with the person's skin for the remainder of the experiment. Since i'm already in contact with the person's skin I thought a wrist-based HRM would be a simple solution. I can't use a finger nail mounted HRM because it would interfere with computer typing or hand writing.

I realize my goal is a bit, well, strange. But it's final application I would like to patent and sell.

Thanks for your input!

-Tay
coolcat
coolcat is offline
#13
Jun20-12, 05:53 PM
P: 1
Hi,

Any development since? I'm looking for a similar product, both for research and potential app development. I need it to transmit wirelessly to a pc or system, as chest straps transmit to wrist displays. "Better" rather depends on the context in which the sensor is being used. Current products seem to have a very narrow focus on the sports and fitness market.

Cathy
MrCDubya
MrCDubya is offline
#14
Jul24-12, 05:47 AM
P: 1
Hi,

What did you use in the end for this task? I have exactly the same problem.
Currently using index finger monitors that get in the way of a task that the user needs to complete.

There must be a product out there!?

CW
afr123
afr123 is offline
#15
Nov3-12, 11:20 PM
P: 4
Yes, such technology exists. It looks like you're looking for a continuous reading (don't need to touch with fingers) of the heart rate without a chest strap. They are rare, but they do exist. If you want a device (iPhone) to read it out, I'd probably suggest the Rhythm, and if you want to read it straight off the watch, I'd suggest the ePulse 2.

I actually recently created a website analyzing different heart rate monitors without chest straps. Here's the page for continuous ones: http://www.heartratemonitorwithoutch...play-monitors/

Be warned that common complaints among heart rate monitors without chest straps is that they are less accurate/reliable - at least when doing very strenuous exercise. Some people hate them, others love them.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Heart rate doubling Medical Sciences 14
Active Denial Technology [Pain guns] General Engineering 14
Exersize and heart rate General Discussion 3