Transforming Orbital Elements from J2000 to Ecliptic Plane

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kepler
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the transformation of orbital elements from the J2000 equatorial frame to the ecliptic plane, including the adjustment of the argument of perihelion, inclination, and ascending node. Participants explore the implications of precession and nutation in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks methods to transform orbital elements from the equatorial plane to the ecliptic plane, specifically mentioning the need to apply precession to another epoch.
  • Another participant suggests that the transformation involves translating ECI coordinates and rotating them, recommending resources like the IERS or the US Naval Observatory for coefficients.
  • A participant reports progress in reducing orbital elements for precession and nutation but still needs to refer the inclination, argument of perihelion, and ascending node to the ecliptic plane.
  • One participant questions the complexity of the proposed methods, suggesting that Newton's laws and original Kepler's laws are sufficient, while acknowledging that relativity introduces some adjustments.
  • Another participant clarifies that the transformation involves changing reference frames from Earth-centered to Sun-centered, arguing that this simplifies the description of motion at greater distances.
  • This participant also mentions the potential utility of an Astronomical Almanac for gathering necessary information and notes the approximate angle difference between the equatorial and ecliptic planes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity and complexity of the transformation methods, with some supporting the use of traditional laws and others advocating for the proposed transformations. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to the transformation.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the need for precise values adjusted for nutation and the complexities involved in transitioning between reference frames, but do not resolve these issues.

kepler
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Hi,

since the previous conversion I needed doesn't seem to be of the common sense, let's try this: I have the orbital elements of a body referred to the equinox J2000 and to the equatorial plane. I need to transform the argument of the Perihélion, the inclination and the ascending node to the ecliptic plane and apply the precession to another epoch.

Any ideas?



Kepler
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
It's hard to give a short answer.

The ECI coordinates need to be translated (by the Sun-Earth distance), then rotated.

Try the IERS or the US Naval Observatory to get the ECI to Barycentric rotation coefficients.
 
First step

I was able to reduce the orbital elements for precession and nutation. Now, it leaves me the work of refer the inclination, arg. of perihelion and asc. node from the equatorial plane to the ecliptic one.

Kepler
 
Why look for a more complex way to explain orbital motions when Newton's [and the original Kepler's] laws work as well they do? Relativity adds a few tweaks, but, you are adding more than a few tweaks. While that does not make you wrong, it makes your theory very suspect. Once you show the math and predictions supported by observational evidence, physicists will fight to fall in line to endorse your theories.
 
No, he's talking about transforming coordinates from one frame of reference (with the center of the Earth as the origin) to another (with the center of the Sun as the origin). Once you move far enough out that the Sun's gravity has more effect on an object's motion than the Earth, using the Sun as your reference frame makes description of the motion a lot simpler than the using the Earth's.

If you have an Astronomical Almanac, I'm pretty sure you could piece together the info you need. Unfortunately, I have a lot more experience with Earth satellite orbits and it would take a bit of work to figure out the transformation to a Barycentric reference frame.

I'm thinking the Right Ascension of Ascending Node would use the same reference, the First Point of Aries, but I wouldn't want to guarantee it. The difference between the equatorial plane and the ecliptic plane is about 23.4 degrees (an astronomical almanac should show the exact value, adjusted for nutation).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K