
#1
Jan2711, 03:05 PM

P: 118

What?
[tex]W = \frac{\epsilon_{0}}{2} \int E^2 d \tau = \frac{\epsilon_{0}}{2 \left( 4 \pi \epsilon_{0} \right)^{2}} \int \frac{q^{2}}{r^{4}} r^{2} sin \theta dr d \theta d \phi = \frac{q^{2}}{8 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{r^{2}} dr = \infty [/tex] Griffith explains this infinite energy coming from the charge being required to assemble itself. What does this mean? Surely tearing apart an electron would not solve all of humanities energy problems. Or is the problem that an actual unit of charge is discrete, whereas the equation treats it as a continuous charge distribution? I'm not sure I understand. 



#2
Jan2711, 04:04 PM

Sci Advisor
P: 5,935

Point charges are "exact" as long as you don't get too close. Quantum theory takes over when r is small enough.




#3
Jan2711, 05:19 PM

P: 7

Don't worry, you are not misunderstanding or missing anything. The fact is, we have no idea what electrons (or any other fundamental particle) "are" or how they came to beHiggs bosons aside, those types of questions belong in the realm of philosophers. Physicists can only measure the properties of a particle or object and its interactions, develop mathematical theories to fit the data, and accept that that is the way the universe chose them to be. Noone has ever made the claim that our system of language + mathematics provides a complete description of the universeat least not without getting laughed at ;).
Randy 



#4
Jan2811, 12:17 AM

P: 1,235

Infinite energy in a point charge
Well, if you drop the pointlike hypothesis, you drop the problem.
It is clear that the pointlike hypothesis cannot be true, if only for the problem you are just reporting. There many known reasons to stop with the pointlike hypothesis. The 1/r² law has been discovered at least 200 year ago on macroscopic objects. Applying it blindly down to the pointlike size is meaningless. Quantum mechanics is often cited as a cutoff for the pointlike hypothesis. However, the pointlike problem remains in quantum mechanics just as in classical physics. The Heisenberg uncertainties just tells us that the "point" cannot be located precisely, but he point is still within the assumptions. My understanding is that quantum electrodynamics tackles the problem more closely because of the coupling between fields and particles being treated in a fully quantum way. Note also that general relativity would also come with some limit to the pointlike assumption, since the electron could not be smaller than its Schwarzschild radius. I think that our curent understanding of the universe allows some people (but not myself) to talk about this topic without being laughed at. 



#5
Feb111, 01:07 AM

P: 118

My apologies for the late reply, but thank you for all of your responses. I take it that this is a strange quirk in electromagnetic theory. However, the mathematical argument seems unassailable, and consequently so do the results. So is the theory wrong, the math wrong, somewhere in between? I'm still a little lost as to why this happens.
Thanks. 



#6
Feb111, 01:32 AM

Mentor
P: 15,576

The answer was given above. The point particle approximation must break down somewhere.




#7
Feb111, 01:40 AM

P: 118

I see. Thank you.




#8
Feb311, 07:14 PM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 6,564

About 2/3 of the way down he talks about how he calculated the selfenergy of the electron and determined that it was finite. AM 



#9
Feb411, 03:02 PM

P: 192

I haven't found Feynman's explanation very satisfying. If the two formulations are truly equivalent then there should be a way to achieve finite self energy with the field method. If not, then they are not truly equivalent, and so they are not describing the same physics. That is just my take.



Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Electric field of an infinite line charge and a point charge!!!  Introductory Physics Homework  1  
Electric field of point charge through infinite plane  Calculus & Beyond Homework  0  
A point charge inside infinite medium of dielectric..  Advanced Physics Homework  8  
Shileding of a point charge by an infinite conducting plane  General Physics  10  
Electric Flux through an Infinite Plane due to a Point charge  Introductory Physics Homework  3 