Stephen Hawking contra philosophy

AI Thread Summary
Stephen Hawking's remarks on philosophy have sparked a debate about their implications for his reputation as a physicist. Critics argue that his comments may reflect a misunderstanding of the philosophical discipline, suggesting that they could be seen as embarrassing. The discussion emphasizes the importance of articulating philosophical questions and arguments clearly, including defining key terms, justifying the relevance of issues, and providing logical support for claims. Participants are encouraged to engage deeply with the topic, summarizing previous arguments and making logical connections explicit. The conversation also references new guidelines for discussions in philosophy forums, highlighting the need for thoroughness and clarity in presenting ideas.
BenVitale
Messages
72
Reaction score
1
Article : Hawking contra Philosophy

Do you think Stephen Hawking's comments on philosophy ought to be embarrassing to the great physicist?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you wish to re-post this according to the guidelines and new rules for Philosophy, you can try again. Otherwise you're just asking for an opinion. You didn't even mention what your own thoughts were, although you tried to lead the reader to a certain point of view.

In general, one should attempt to flesh out questions and arguments in the philosophy forums adequately enough that readers will have a good understanding of the problem, the backdrop against which it resides, and the justification of one's perspective. This might include

* explicitly defining key terms;
* justifying why this is a valid issue or problem in the first place;
* explicitly stating starting premises or assumptions;
* providing logical or empirical support for such premises or assumptions;
* making subtle logical steps more explicit;
* summarizing previous arguments made on the topic and explaining how they are relevant to your argument;
* etc.

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=47294

And the new additional rules.

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=459350
 
Last edited:
Thread 'RIP George F. Smoot III (1945-2025)'
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Smoot https://physics.berkeley.edu/people/faculty/george-smoot-iii https://apc.u-paris.fr/fr/memory-george-fitzgerald-smoot-iii https://elements.lbl.gov/news/honoring-the-legacy-of-george-smoot/ https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2006/smoot/facts/ https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200611/nobel.cfm https://inspirehep.net/authors/988263 Structure in the COBE Differential Microwave Radiometer First-Year Maps (Astrophysical Journal...

Similar threads

Replies
94
Views
14K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Back
Top