Is f(x,t)=Acos(K(x-vt)+phi) a wave equation solution?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around whether the function f(x, t) = Acos(K(x-vt) + phi) is a solution to the wave equation, which is a fundamental concept in wave mechanics and partial differential equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster seeks alternative methods to demonstrate that the function satisfies the wave equation, expressing some familiarity with calculus. Other participants mention that any function of the form f(x,t) = g(x-vt) meets the criteria for the wave equation, prompting further inquiry into the reasoning behind this.

Discussion Status

Participants are engaging in a constructive dialogue, with some providing hints related to the computation of second-order partial derivatives. There is a recognition of the need for calculus in understanding the wave equation, though some participants are curious about non-calculus approaches.

Contextual Notes

Participants are reminded that the forum guidelines encourage providing hints rather than complete solutions, which shapes the nature of the responses and inquiries.

leoflc
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
Can someone show me that [tex]f(x, t) = A\cos(K(x-vt) + \phi)[/tex] is in fact a solution of the wave equation?
I kind of know how to show it by using calculus, but is there other way to show it?

Thank you very much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any function f that can be expressed as

[tex]f(x,t)=g(x-vt)[/tex]

satisfies the wave equation. You don't even have to know what g is to show it.
 
Could you please show me a little more? I don't really get it why that will satisfie the wave equation...
Thank you very much!
 
We're supposed to give hints here, not complete answers, but if you compute the second-order partial derivative

[tex]\frac{\partial^2 f(x,t)}{\partial t^2}[/tex]

using the formula

[tex]f(x,t)=g(x-vt)[/tex]

you're almost there. Does the result look anything like any other second-order partial derivative that appears in the wave equation?
 
Thanks, I'll give it a try.
But I'm just wondering, is there any other way to show it beside using calculus?
Thanks again!
 
I don't think so. The wave equation is a partial differential equation, so any explanation would have to involve derivatives in some way.

I'm pretty sure that there's no easier way to understand the wave equation than the way I suggested. You should note that the graphs of the functions [tex]h_t[/tex], defined by

[tex]h_t(x)=g(x-vt)[/tex]

can be thought of as the individual frames of a "movie" that shows the graph of g moving with velocity v.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K