Solving for f in f(f(x)) = 2x^2 - 1

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding a function f such that f(f(x)) equals 2x^2 - 1. Participants explore various approaches, including polynomial forms, trigonometric substitutions, and considerations of domain restrictions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest guessing potential forms for f, with one proposing a polynomial of the form f(x) = ax^2 + bx + c.
  • Others express frustration with the difficulty of the problem, noting that their attempts at various functions, including derivatives and inverse functions, have not yielded correct results.
  • One participant argues that f is not a polynomial, citing issues with simple forms like f(x) = x or f(x) = x².
  • A suggestion is made to solve the problem for a restricted domain, emphasizing the importance of specifying domain and range for functions.
  • Another participant proposes a trigonometric approach, suggesting that f(cosy) = cos(sqrt(2)y) could be a solution, but notes the need for domain restrictions to avoid complex arguments.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of including an x^2 term in f(x), leading to an x^4 term in f(f(x)), which raises questions about the coefficients involved.
  • One participant attempts to derive f(f(x)) using trigonometric identities, specifically relating cos(2t) to the desired expression, but encounters difficulties in the process.
  • A later post humorously suggests an unconventional approach involving imaginary numbers, indicating a playful exploration of potential solutions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with no consensus on the form of f or whether a solution exists. Some agree that f is likely not a polynomial, while others explore various mathematical approaches without reaching a definitive conclusion.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of domain restrictions and the potential for complex solutions, indicating that assumptions about the nature of f may significantly impact the discussion.

Xamfy19
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
What is the f, when f(f(x)) = 2x^2 - 1,
Thanks a lot!

:confused:
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
looks like homework. hint: take a guess.
 
I have tried different answers, none of them working. I even tried to use derivatives or inverse functions, still no correct answer came out from my guessing
 
matt prolly has some really ingenious trick up his sleeve!

what i have is pretty ugly!

assume f(x) = ax^2+bx+c
f(f(x)) = a(ax^2+bx+c)^2 + b(ax^2+bx+c) + c
simplify this...
calculate f(f(x)) for any three values of x say -1,0,1
and find corresponding values of a,b,c

-- AI
 
Just plug in f[x] for x. There's probably more to it than that, I'm sure.
 
Wow, this problem is much more difficult than it looks. I've been trying for almost an hour and I haven't figured it out yet. The closest I got was

[tex]f(x)=2^\frac{1}{\sqrt 2 +1}x^\sqrt 2[/tex]

but that's not the correct answer, since this f would satisfy

[tex]f(f(x))=2x^2[/tex]

What TenaliRaman suggested doesn't work. f is definitely not a polynomial. (Try f(x)=x and f(x)=x² and you'll see the problems immediately).
 
Fredrik said:
What TenaliRaman suggested doesn't work. f is definitely not a polynomial. (Try f(x)=x and f(x)=x² and you'll see the problems immediately).

Hmm why wouldn't it work?? :confused:

-- AI
 
Nope, no ingenious trick springs to my mind. I thought I saw a non-ingenious one but it wasn't right.

I can solve it for a restricted domain.

Standard maths gripe:
A function needs its domain and range specifying.
 
Last edited:
TenaliRaman said:
Hmm why wouldn't it work?? :confused:

-- AI
If you include an x^2 term in f(x) you get an x^4 term in f(f(x)).
 
  • #10
Does this problem really have a solution? I don't see how it could. If anyone figures this out (either finds the correct f, or proves that the problem has no solution), I would appreciate if they could post the solution here.
 
  • #11
Here's a 'solution', haven't thought about it too closely to be honest:

let cosy = x

then f^2(cosy) = cos2y

so the function f(cosy) = cos(sqrt(2)y) will do, since cos(y)=x we have

f(x) = cos(sqrt(2)arccos(x))

Note that unless one wants to pass to complex arguments then one needs to restrict the domain a lot.
 
  • #12
I just tried using trig to substitue into the composite function. However, I need more help. The following was my thought:

Since f(f(x))=2x^2-1, cos(2t)=2x^2-1, if sin(t)=x.

If I can find how to derive to f(f(x))=cos(2t) from f(x)=?, then it may be solved. Any suggestion?
 
  • #13
"cos(2t)=2x^2-1, if sin(t)=x."

try putting t=0 in there: 1=-1 is what you are claiming.
 
  • #14
you are right. Thanks
 
  • #15
Fredrik said:
If you include an x^2 term in f(x) you get an x^4 term in f(f(x)).

the coefficient of x^4 could be zero ...

-- AI
 
  • #16
only if the coefficient of x^2 were zero.
 
  • #17
Funny...I also tried the substitution x=cos t yesterday, but I got stuck at f(f(cos t))=cos 2t. I didn't see that it was easy to continue from there. I agree that the correct answer is

[tex]f(x)=\cos(\sqrt 2 \arccos x)[/tex]
 
  • #18
matt grime said:
only if the coefficient of x^2 were zero.
It was definitely not my day! :cry:

-- AI
 
  • #19
Xamfy19 said:
What is the f, when f(f(x)) = 2x^2 - 1,
Thanks a lot!

:confused:

sqr(2)x+j

j is special:
j*j = -1, j*x = 0, j <> 1*j

Yay for cheating! :rolleyes:

Or...
f(x):

f(x) = r(x+i)
I returns the imaginary part of a number, R returns the real part
if I(f(x)) > 1 then f(x) = R(f(x))

Function not defined when x = .5
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K