What's the Hill Incline Angle Based on Car's Power Difference?

  • Thread starter Thread starter NotaPhysicsMan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle Hill Incline
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the incline angle of a hill based on the power difference experienced by a car traveling up and down the hill. The problem involves concepts from mechanics, specifically forces acting on the car due to gravity, friction, and the power output of the engine.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between power, force, and speed, questioning how to express these in terms of gravitational and frictional forces. There are discussions about the role of the 47 hp power difference and how to set up the equations for both uphill and downhill scenarios.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, attempting to clarify their understanding of the forces involved and how they relate to the power calculations. Some have offered hints and corrections regarding the setup of equations, while others express confusion about specific components and calculations.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of missing information, such as the coefficient of friction, and some participants are struggling with the correct interpretation of forces acting on the car. The discussion reflects a range of interpretations and attempts to reconcile different approaches to the problem.

NotaPhysicsMan
Messages
146
Reaction score
0
This is supposed to be a hard question...

A 1900kg car experiences a combinded force of air resistance and friction that has the same magnitude whether the car goes up or down a hill at 27m/s. Going up a hill, the car's engine needs to produce 47 hp (1horsepower=745.7 Watts) more power to sustain the constant velocity than it does going down the same hill. At what angle is the hill inclined above the horizontal?

Ok, where do I even start?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The applied force times the speed is the power delivered by the vehicle. Simply write those out for both cases in terms of the gravitational force and the frictional force. Then simply subtract the equations! :-)
 
but doesn't it have to be the average speed. P= F x Vave?
 
Where does the 47 hp come into play?
 
You said the speed is fixed and is the same for both the trip up and and the trip down the hill. You need to figure out what force the engine must exert for both cases and for each case the power delivered will be the respective force times that speed. Hint: Going up the hill the force is [itex]mg \cos \theta + F_{friction}[/itex]
 
Hmm, are you sure it isn't mgsin(theta), the x-components right?. Going up hill, wouldn't friction oppose the x-force moving in another direction?
 
Yes, of course it's sine and not cosine! Good catch!
 
ok force of friction, I don't have the coeffecient of friction. Once I find the force to go uphill that's also equal to the force downhill with exception to the extra 47hp. Then I can separate into x and y compents. All I need is the force uphill or downhill.!
 
you don't need to know anything about friction, since its force is the same in either direction and so will cancel. You don't know the total hp either, just the difference.
 
  • #10
ok I'm stuck here at this point: I have the F going down is equal to the one going up, right so let's see: (Engine force+1298N (the 47 hp)=the x component mgsin@. Here's where I'm stuck I don't know Engine force, and I don't konw @.
 
  • #11
ok according to Tide, The force going uphill is mgsin@+Ffriction

so the one going down hill is mgsin@-Ffriction

He said subtract the two, which doesn't make sense to me.
 
  • #12
I read the problem wrong again, let me fix it.

[tex]P_{uphill} - P_{downhill} = 47hp[/tex]

Yes read krab's post and the original problem to understand.
 
Last edited:
  • #13
Ok so let me see:

P=FV

P(uphill)=mgsin@ +F(friction)
P(downhill)=mgsin@-F(friction)

ok so I subtract them:

47hp=mgsin@+F - (mgsin@-F(friction)
47hp = 35047 Watts or 1298 N.

1298N=mgsin@-mgsin@+F+F
1298N=2F(friction)
F= 649 N. Funny Friction doesn't cancel out!

hmm,

Cos@=Wx/W
=649N/mg
=649N/18639N
=cos inverse(0.0348)
=88 degrees!

sounds kinda funny, that would be too steep.
 
  • #14
anyone want to verify?
 
  • #15
ah nuts, I think I did something wrong. Ok I think it should be sin@=Wx/W? that'll make it 2.0 degrees! humm. either too steep or too flat. What's wrong?
 
  • #16
NotaPhysicsMan said:
Ok so let me see:

P=FV

P(uphill)=mgsin@ +F(friction)
P(downhill)=mgsin@-F(friction)
What you are calling "P" is really the applied force, not the power. (Since you didn't multiply by V.) You need to rethink what force is needed in going up and down the hill.

Since the speed is constant, the applied force must just overcome friction and gravity. Going up, gravity acts against you (thus the applied force must be greater); going down, gravity acts in your favor (so the applied force is less). Friction always acts against you.
 
  • #17
ah dang I forgot about V! Ack I'm on it.
 
  • #18
k wait so all my other stuff are correct right? but I just didn't multiply by V? Adding V makes my angle pretty much 0!
 
  • #19
NotaPhysicsMan said:
k wait so all my other stuff are correct right? but I just didn't multiply by V? Adding V makes my angle pretty much 0!
Nope, not correct. You have the forces wrong. Reread my post, get the forces right, then worry about multiplying by V.
 
  • #20
P(uphill)=(F+1298)sin@ +F(friction)
P(downhill)=mgsin@-F(friction)

The only thing I see is that maybe I didn't add the force needed to get up there, the extra 47 hp or 1298N. Going downhill, I have friction against so that's neg.

a little help lol.
 
  • #21
hmm, well is my approach at least correct?
 
  • #22
I got it! the answer is 2.0 degrees?
Simple mistake really, didnt' take account of the 1298N and mixed up some of the negative signs.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
5K