Is My Proof for Probabilities and Independence Correct?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The proof presented for the probability of the union of independent events is correct. It establishes that for independent events A1, A2, ..., An, the equation P(A1 ∪ A2 ∪ ... ∪ An) = 1 - Πi∈I(1 - P(Ai)) holds true. The proof utilizes the independence of events and their complements, leading to the conclusion that the probability of the union can be expressed in terms of the product of the probabilities of their complements. Additionally, the discussion addresses the independence of events A, B, and C, suggesting that proving A and (B ∪ C) are independent can be achieved using the definition of independence.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of probability theory, specifically independent events
  • Familiarity with the concepts of union and intersection of events
  • Knowledge of complement events in probability
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical notation and LaTeX formatting
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the definition of independence in probability theory
  • Learn how to apply the product rule for independent events
  • Research the properties of complements in probability
  • Explore advanced probability topics such as conditional independence
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, statistics, and data science, particularly those focusing on probability theory and its applications in various fields.

dionys
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi...Can you please check if my proof is correct?

Exercise:
A1,A2,...An are independently events.
Prove that :
P(A1[union]A2[union]...[union]An) = 1-Πi[element-of]I(1-P(Ai))

note for this (Πi[element-of]I(1-P(Ai))
I={1,2,...n)
P([intersect]Ai)= Π P(Ai)
for 3 events A1,A2,A3
means: P(A1[intersect]A2)=P(A1)*P(A2)
P(A2[intersect]A3)=P(A2)*P(A3)
P(A2[intersect]A3)=P(A2)*P(A3)
P(A1[intersect]A2[intersect]A3)=P(A1)* P(A2) * P(A3)


Now my proof:
We know that P([intersect]Ai)= Π P(Ai)
if A1,A2,...,An are independent then and the complements
are independent

P([intersect]Ai)complement = Π P(Aicomplement)
P([union](Ai compl) ) = Π(1-P(Ai))
1-P([union]Ai)= Π(1-P(Ai))
-P([union]Ai)=-1+Π(1-P(Ai))
Finally ... we got our proof
P([union]Ai)=1-Πi[element-of]I(1-P(Ai))
Is it correct?


And one more...
but i don't know how to prove this:
A,B,C are independent
We must prove that A and B[union]C are independent too
...?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I couldn't follow some steps in your derivation (then again, it's pretty early here and I`m half asleep).

(Try using LateX, it makes your notation look more sexy. Click on the formulas to see the code.)

I would do the following:
[tex]P\left(\bigcup_{i=1}^n A_i\right)=1-P\left((\bigcup_{i=1}^n A_i)^c\right)=1-P\left(\bigcap_{i=1}^n A_i^c\right)=1-\prod_{i=1}^nP\left(A_i^c\right)=1-\prod_{i=1}^n(1-P\left(A_i)\right)[/tex]
 


Hi there,

Your proof for the first exercise is correct! Good job.

For the second exercise, you can use the definition of independence to prove it. Recall that two events A and B are independent if and only if P(A[intersect]B) = P(A)*P(B). So, to prove that A and B[union]C are independent, we need to show that P(A[intersect](B[union]C)) = P(A)*P(B[union]C).

To do this, we can use the fact that P(A[intersect](B[union]C)) = P((A[intersect]B)[union](A[intersect]C)), and then use the definition of independence for A[intersect]B and A[intersect]C. Can you take it from here?

Let me know if you have any other questions or need further clarification. Good luck!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K