| New Reply |
Survivable Birth Defects and the Rise of Mutants |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Mar24-11, 11:17 PM | #1 |
|
|
Survivable Birth Defects and the Rise of Mutants
I hope this isn't a half-baked question but it's in regard to recent news stories about massive rises in birth defects in the Iraqi city of Fallujah since the US assault in 2004, for example http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009...-birth-defects and the possibility of future birth defects following radiation exposure in Japan. (Hopefully, this thread will not get derailed by boring political discussion)
What I want to know is with a 15 fold rise in birth defects and one hospital reporting that 70% of babies born in a month had some kind of deformity, what is the probability of there being some kind of physically beneficial birth defect or at the very least, non-detrimental ones? Also, is it possible that a particular mutation can be passed into subsequent generations? More specifically: in a few hundred years, will we have to worry about a hoarde of mutants rising up out of radioactive waste zones to exact revenge against the world? |
| Mar25-11, 05:51 AM | #2 |
|
|
|
| Mar25-11, 07:04 AM | #3 |
|
|
Does the same reasoning apply to bacteria, which are extremely adaptable to their environments? Suppose that a culture of E. Coli were exposed to some ionizing radiation that damaged their DNA in such a way as to cause unpredictable mutations. Could some of the mutated E. Coli prove to be better at adapting to a new environment than the original culture?
I'm sure that the answer is, "yes, but it's improbable;" what I'm interested in knowing, though, is if such a thing has ever been observed experimentally, wherein unpredictable mutations (as opposed to deliberate genetic engineering) lead to a more robust species. |
| Mar25-11, 07:30 AM | #4 |
|
|
Survivable Birth Defects and the Rise of MutantsHowever here is one hypothetical example. |
| Apr10-11, 05:06 PM | #5 |
|
|
I don't know what the probability would be, but i'd guess the odds that a physical mutation (in the sense of apperance/attractiveness?) would be benificial (compared to if they didn't have the mutation) is low. On a side note, by the title of this thread, I assumed it was from the perspective of healthcare. In that as healthcare improves so does the survivorbility of new borns with "mutations", and inturn would result in a higher per capita of "mutants". I thought the implied question was what are the implications when reproduction is considered given the possible trend. |
| New Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Survivable Birth Defects and the Rise of Mutants
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| zero dimensional defects | Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics | 6 | ||
| Top Russian Spy Defects! | Current Events | 2 | ||
| Interpretation of double mutants in signaling pathways | Biology | 0 | ||
| Topological defects | General Astronomy | 1 | ||
| Birth Defects | Biology | 6 | ||