Angular Frequency, Time, and Angle

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between angular frequency, time, and angle, particularly focusing on the behavior of the cosine function with angles larger than 2π. Participants explore the implications of using large angles in trigonometric functions and the periodic nature of these functions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants discuss the relationship between angular frequency, time, and angle, noting that for θ = 2π, one complete cycle corresponds to the period T, with T = 1/f.
  • There is a suggestion that θ does not need to be constrained to values less than 2π, as larger angles indicate multiple cycles.
  • One participant questions the validity of using angles larger than 2π in the cosine function, expressing confusion over calculator errors when inputting large arguments.
  • Another participant explains that calculators may have limitations on the size of arguments but that the cosine function is periodic and can handle any angle by reducing it to a corresponding angle within the range of [0, 2π].
  • A further inquiry is made regarding the equivalence of angles in degrees, specifically whether angles like 5 degrees and 1085 degrees yield the same cosine value.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the periodic nature of the cosine function and that angles can be reduced to a range of [0, 2π]. However, there remains some uncertainty regarding the implications of using large angles in practical calculations and the limitations of calculators.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the notation and the handling of angles larger than 2π, as well as the conditions under which the cosine function operates effectively.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying trigonometry, angular motion, or anyone dealing with periodic functions in physics or engineering contexts.

Larry717
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
pi = 3.14159...
angular frequency = 2(pi)f
theta [in radians] = 2(pi)f t

t = theta / 2(pi)f

For theta = 0, t = 0
For theta = 2(pi), t = 1/f

If 0 =< theta <= 2(pi)
Then 0 =< t <= 1/f

[I'm not sure if the notation above
is correct.]

Is the foregoing true for any frequency?
For instance, 10^10 radians/s?

Larry
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When [tex]\theta=2\pi[/tex], one whole cycle has been completed. By definition, the time taken for a whole cycle is the period [tex]T[/tex]. The relationship between the period and the frequency is [tex]T=1/f[/tex].

Note that [tex]\theta[/tex] denotes angular displacement. There is no need to constraint the value of [tex]\theta[/tex] to be less than [tex]2\pi[/tex]. When it is larger than [tex]2\pi[/tex], it just simply means that it has completed more than one cycle. For instance, when [tex]\theta=4\pi[/tex], it has completed two cycles and certainly the time taken will be twice of the period, i.e. [tex]2T[/tex].

Hope that I do answer your question correctly.


Kenneth
 
Taking this a step further

Ken,

Thanks for reviewing the basics about frequency, period, and angle.
I still need some help with angles larger than 2pi.

Take the equation for a sinusoidally varying
electric field:

E = Eo cos(2pift)

In the above, t doesn't have to be the period.

Now, for a hypothetical example, let:

2pif = 10^10 radians/s
and t = 1s

What does cos(2pift) equal?

My calculator gives an error message. Doesn't
the angle have to be be between 0 and 2pi for
the cosine function to work?

Or, doesn't the product of f and t have to vary
between zero and 1? (same thing as above)

Larry
 
The reason why your calculator gives you an error message, is that the argument you've given it is larger than the maximum argument of the cosine function your calculator has been built to handle.
Basically, you're giving it a major headache, and it responds with a grumpy error message.
 
Getting Closer!

arildno said:
The reason why your calculator gives you an error message, is that the argument you've given it is larger than the maximum argument of the cosine function your calculator has been built to handle.
Basically, you're giving it a major headache, and it responds with a grumpy error message.

If I understand you correctly, you are saying that an argument of any size
is ok.

Isn't there an algorithm that can be done by hand or by computer program that can take an agument of any size (an angle of any size) and reduce it to an angle between 0 and 2pi?

Recall that for cos(2pift) the argument (the angle) will always be positive. And, that the cosine function must return a value between -1 and 1.

Given the angle 10^10 radians. Given that there is another angle between
0 and 2pi that will return the same value for the cosine function, is the
smaller angle equivalent to the larger angle?

Larry
 
Recall that [tex]\cos(\theta)[/tex] is a periodic function of [tex]\theta[/tex]. The period in this case is [tex]2\pi[/tex]. This function will repeat itself in the range of [tex][0,2\pi], [2\pi,4\pi], [4\pi,6\pi][/tex], etc. Therefore, whatever value of [tex]\theta[/tex] you have, you will always find a value of [tex]\theta[/tex] within [tex]2\pi[/tex] so that the value of the function is the same.

Hope that this clarifies your doubt.


Kenneth
 
Clarification

To illustrate more clearly what I'm after I'd like to switch
from units in radians to units in degrees.

Given theta = 1085 deg.

n = 1085/360 = 3.0138889

phi = 360(n-3) = 5 deg.

cos(phi) = cos(theta)

Now, are the angles 5 deg. and 1085 deg. equivalent?

Larry
 
Yes, they are equivalent.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K