Temperature and Entropy


by Gear300
Tags: entropy, temperature
Gear300
Gear300 is offline
#1
Mar29-11, 07:28 AM
P: 1,133
The fundamental temperature is defined so that 1/τ = ∂σ/∂U. This relation occurs as an equilibrium state, so wouldn't that imply that ∂σ/∂U = 0, leaving the temperature undefined?
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Sensitive detection method may help impede illicit nuclear trafficking
CERN: World-record current in a superconductor
Beam on target: CEBAF accelerator achieves 12 GeV commissioning milestone
Mapes
Mapes is offline
#2
Mar29-11, 07:43 AM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
Mapes's Avatar
P: 2,532
Quote Quote by Gear300 View Post
This relation occurs as an equilibrium state, so wouldn't that imply that ∂σ/∂U = 0
Why?
Gear300
Gear300 is offline
#3
Mar29-11, 08:02 AM
P: 1,133
∂σ/∂U = 1/g(∂g/∂U), in which g is the multiplicity of states. Let us say that the system is uncoupled, then wouldn't the equilibrium condition imply ∂g/∂U = 0 (or is it that temperature is defined specifically for a coupling between systems)?

Mapes
Mapes is offline
#4
Mar29-11, 08:12 AM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
Mapes's Avatar
P: 2,532

Temperature and Entropy


I think I see what you mean. I suppose one would have a problem defining temperature for a system that one absolutely could not add energy too, even in theory. Then ∂σ/∂U would have no meaning, U being constant. But every system dealt with in practice can conceivably be heated and/or have work performed on it. If heated, the entropy of the system would increase; if reversible work were to be done, the entropy would not increase.
Gear300
Gear300 is offline
#5
Mar29-11, 08:17 AM
P: 1,133
I see...so does that make it unreasonable to speak of the equilibrium states of an isolated system?
Mapes
Mapes is offline
#6
Mar29-11, 08:55 AM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
Mapes's Avatar
P: 2,532
Quote Quote by Gear300 View Post
I see...so does that make it unreasonable to speak of the equilibrium states of an isolated system?
No, but it seems unreasonable to speak of the temperature of a system whose energy could not be altered, even in theory.
DrDu
DrDu is offline
#7
Mar29-11, 09:45 AM
Sci Advisor
P: 3,361
Quote Quote by Gear300 View Post
∂σ/∂U = 1/g(∂g/∂U), in which g is the multiplicity of states. Let us say that the system is uncoupled, then wouldn't the equilibrium condition imply ∂g/∂U = 0 (or is that temperature is defined specifically for a coupling between systems)?
Temperature is defined by the zeroth law of thermodynamics, i.e. transitivity of equilibrium: If two systems A and B are in equilibriumwhen brought into contact and B and C are also in equilibrium when brought into contact, then A and C will also be in equilibrium when brought into contact. This allows the introduction of temperature specifically for coupled systems.
Rap
Rap is offline
#8
Mar29-11, 09:46 AM
P: 789
Quote Quote by Gear300 View Post
I see...so does that make it unreasonable to speak of the equilibrium states of an isolated system?
Yes, temperature is defined in terms of systems being coupled. If two systems are thermally connected and allowed to equilibrate, their temperatures are, by the zeroth law of thermodynamics, the same. An isolated system that can never be connected to another system, can never be connected to a thermometer, and so its temperature will remain unknown, but thats a technological problem. It still has a temperature, it just cannot be practically measured.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Temperature and Entropy of an ideal gas Introductory Physics Homework 2
change in entropy at constant temperature Introductory Physics Homework 5
finding temperature from entropy Advanced Physics Homework 1
Same temperature and entropy Classical Physics 2
Black Hole Temperature and Entropy Astrophysics 5